Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD MAY 17, 1993 <br />ZONING FILE f1826 - CONT. <br />Nolan said he would be willing to second <br />eliminated. <br />the deck were <br />Mr. Henson reiterated the Importance of the deck to him. <br />Rowlette asked how important the existing garage Is to the <br />appIicant. <br />Mr. Henson stated they need the additional storage and It would not <br />be practical to landscape out that far from the house. <br />Merlo stated he felt it would be a travesty not to approve this <br />application for the benefit of the lake. He felt the applicants <br />could grade the drive so the run-off was tunneled to the lawn area. <br />Rowlette disagreed, and stated she felt without the removal of the <br />existing garage and concrete walls, the drainage probIem wouId only <br />be exacerbated. <br />Lindquist stated his concern with the deck going beyond the <br />setbacks of the existing h^use. <br />Nolan indicated he would consider a trade-off. <br />Mr. Henson pointed out there is nothing left on the property with <br />which to trade. <br />Rowlette said she would like to see more hardcover removed, and <br />added she is not against some kind of deck on the lakeside, but <br />would not be forced to use the removal of the tennis court as a <br />bargaining chip. <br />Chair Schroeder clarified to the applicant his options. <br />Mr. Henson asked that the application be denied. <br />It was moved by Chair Schroeder, seconded by Rowlette, to recommend <br />denial of Application #1826 for Robert and Ann Henson, 2166 <br />Shadywood Road, based on the fact the encroachment into the 0-75’ <br />zone is too excessive in consideration of the additional hardcover <br />in the 75-250’ zone, and in consideration of the removal of the <br />tennis court. Ayes 6. nays 1. Peterson voted nay. <br />The applicants left at this time and returned later. <br />ilMiiildliMiliMlita,. <br />' 1