Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD JUNE 21, 1993 <br />ZONING FILE #1823 - CONT. <br />Peterson reported they just approved a subdivision for the Wirtjes <br />property to the rear of the Rossing home, and stressed that outside <br />storage would become a problem when that lot is developed. <br />Rowiette understood there would not be large commercial vehicles <br />located on the property. <br />Rossing clarified she Is allowed one per the ordinance, and one- <br />ton vans do not count as a commercial vehicle. <br />Berg asked how many people live in the home and how many vehicles <br />are on the property. <br />Rossing replied there are currently 4 adults in the home, but soon <br />to be 6, and they will have 5 to 6 vehicles. <br />Mabusth asked about the number of boats and the size. <br />Rossing replied typically it is only one boat - a 15’ runabout. <br />Nolan asked about the storage of construction material outside. <br />Rossing reported her son is in the construction business, but <br />typically only parks his truck on tne property and construction <br />material is stored off site. <br />Mabusth indicated the business would require approval of a Home <br />Occupation License. <br />Rowiette expressed concern that there is not enough parking on the <br />property for 6 vehicles, and the need to appease the neighbors’ <br />concerns about the aopearance of the property. <br />Lindquist stated he is not comfortable having any outside storage <br />hidden behind a privacy f^^ce. <br />Mabusth reiterated the Issue here Is not the variance for the deck <br />addition, but rather the matter of a violation of allowed exterior <br />storage in a residential yard. The applicant does not need a <br />variance for construction of a second accessory structure and <br />installation of the fence. <br />Lindquist stated he has no problem witit tne deck addition. He asked <br />their options regarding tne storage. <br />I