My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-21-1993 Planning PacketC
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
06-21-1993 Planning PacketC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2023 4:18:00 PM
Creation date
10/26/2023 4:11:36 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
285
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD JUNE 21, 1SS3 <br />ZONING FILE #1839 - CONT. <br />Owens stated the pipe is perforated once it gets past the house and <br />is below grade about 3’. Most of the water is gone by the time it <br />outlets into the lawn area but the piping does end 30 to 40' from <br />the lake. <br />It was moved by Smith, seconded by Berg, to recommend approval of <br />Application #1839 for Robert H. Owens, 1700 Bohn’s Point Road, for <br />variances to construct additions to his existing residence, subject <br />to hardcover removals as shown on the plan, and subject to staff <br />reviewing the drainage system off the driveway. Ayes 5, nays 1. <br />Rowlette voted nay because she felt the applicant could have <br />reduced hardcover further in the 75-250’ zone. <br />Owens stated there is an additional 4’ plastic area to be removed <br />which is not shown on the plans. <br />(#12) #1823 MARGE ROSSING, <br />130 CYGNET PLACE - VARIANCE - REQUEST TO REVIEW AMENDED PROPOSAL <br />Marge Rossing was present. <br />Mabusth explained the applicant proposes amendment of her original <br />request to include a 4x12’ wide dock on the northeast side of the <br />addition. She reported in lieu of landscaping to screen the <br />existing detached garage, the applicant proposes a privacy fence. <br />She added the applicant has almost compioted work on the existing <br />garage. She noted the applicant has not shown how she plans to <br />control parking on the property. <br />Rossing added she proposes a <br />garages. <br />split rail fence between the two <br />Mabusth stated that is to eliminate the undefined parking ar^sa and <br />use of grassed lawn areas for parking. <br />Peterson clarified the purpose of the new garage was to allow <br />storage of vehicles Inside. He expressed concern that the privacy <br />fence would only encourage the storage of items outside. <br />Lindquist questioned the gravel area around the garage and asked <br />if that is intended for parking. <br />Rossing stated they intend to use the gravel area for the storage <br />of their boats. She noted because of the existing tree line along <br />the street property line, the privacv fence was the best <br />alternative for screening. <br />AUMi
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.