08-15-1994 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r Zoning File #1958 August 8. 1994 Page 3 PUnnine Commission encourased a reduction in density to either the two unit or lot line rea^n1tS"o units. cS* member strongly encouraged applicant to constder comb.nmg all three parcels into one unit. The lot sundards have been considerably improved with the proiwsed ^ subdivision does not involve the creation of new lots. The subdivision wi res elimination of one existing lot of record. Access Review Exhibit E-3. During the 1992 sketch plan review, access for the two lot division was to S^a sta^access at Shorefine Drive. The relocated ^ess ^<>"8 lot line would have been too close to the intersection of Dunwoody and Shorelme. Tte ipplication involves a single access to Lot 1 at the existing “ guff musl Access at Dunwoody is not shown nor is it recommended along the 55 of frontage, btart recommend that access be provided from applicanfs homesread P^“‘- northern curb cut of applicant’s circular drive (review Exhibit H). The Coimty " to Sent on the proposed subdivision. As of this writing, staff h^ rece no wn«en rc^il but they have advised via the phone that they will seek a 40 nght-of-way dedication for C y road - In additional 7’. The most eastern access is acceptable as it aligns with awess on north to County ^ area. If properties are to be developed, they would encourage the removal retaining walls and garage within County right-of-way. Grading/Drainage/Flood Plain Review Exhibit G. Note the flood plain elevation is located close to Shoreline rSo7de.ailed grading and drainage plans with each redevelopment plan for the two lots. Existing Site Conditions The City commenced hazardous building actions against this proper^ some ™ ™,,J^„p„.,,lCwastemov^^ The boarded up stracmres and The former rest Oorrel B arc a constant source of complaints from surrounding SXIlInding that several property owners