Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1958 <br />August 8. 1994 <br />Page 2 <br />Secuon 10.36. Subd. 16 (C) (6) - Average lakestiore setback <br />3.Section 10.36. Subd. 16 (L) - Hardcover limitations. <br />6. Section 11.03. Subd. 2 - Definitions. <br />Wfoval requited when lot line rearraneemem involves lots that do not meet the standatds of the zoning district. involves <br />^finition «(b) - Class II subdivision. Subdivision may involve ihe vacation of existinn <br />•** «’«ing lot lines, subdivision will involv^ <br />the dedication of new drainage and utUity basements ato^g t^rnewT^LfitllliTmVine aM <br />er utility easements along west side of property, refer to Exhibit I. <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Application <br />B - Plat Map <br />C - Property Owners’ List <br />D - Existing Development <br />E-1-4 Options^of Redevelopment Considered in 1992 Sketch Plan Review (Application <br />F - Legal Description of Property <br />G - Survey of Replat <br />H - Gustafson Report <br />I - Sewer As-Built <br />Review of Application <br />The current subdivision application involves the replatting of three separate narcel«; inm <br />wo lots review Exhibits D and G. The three parcels had originally c™uSd”™r^e^.den“l <br />ha«’bLnTs^s*^~urlir''“™' <br />In a 1992 sketch plan review, the City was asked to consider various options for <br />preferred a Planned Residential Development of four units^ refer to <br />mto two lots and redevelopment of the thtee existing lots. If lots wete to ^ d?ve^““ <br />current configurations, multiple and excessive variances would have been required. The <br />t <br />I