Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />Zoning File #1941 <br />July 15, 1994 <br />Page 3 <br />. Tfc, iu,n «orv lakeside addition will provide for an expanded family room and living <br />rlZ'oJ^ mwr level and an exercise room and family rec room at the lower level No grade <br />room on Ih pi«____ aonlicants should be questioned about access on grade levelroom on Jhe upper levd a^ an shouli be questioned about access on grade'level <br />level decks are propo ^ „nner level deck Although increases in structural coverage <br />from patio doors shown Le been included with proposal, <br />are propos^ major ec ^^ea of I 58% and in the 75-250’ setback area at 1,889 <br />is proptrsed at 15.04. requiring a 15 s.f. <br />variance of .04%. <br />Please review Exhibit B, cfm“ <br />st";rls:ltS^n P-” « <br />property. <br />located ““ «as replaced with the upper level three season porch <br />existing 12 *'8 ^he porch was noted as being 40’ from the wetlands not relereiKed <br />proposed at ir9 x22.6 P permission to install a 3' wide cat walk or <br />as pond or lake. In 198. bedtoom tor safety <br />balcony along the perimeter aonrv A building permit was not issued as it <br />reasons as bedroom was constmcle wi p unner level and the balcony was needed for <br />—z'S ’u.rs iw. Mi™«. <br />Review Exhibits M, N and O, inliirjsrs's.s ?“•.'■<«.,~ «■ <br />channel was installed pnor to 1960. <br />Review Exhibits B and H. in 1986. that 144 s.f. wooden <br />balcony removed a concrete patio at “PP “*‘7 * „ Japee application to allow the <br />deck. The owners at that time were advised to apply f^ „ include an <br />grade level wooden deck to remam. The owne structure After the review, <br />upper level 3’ wide connecting balcony along the l^esj landscape areas stating that he <br />.rapplicant rehtsed to remove P'^" ^ oiin^:rrrk“::^:™^eS^::s:;:truiidi^