My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-16-1994 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
05-16-1994 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2023 4:34:16 PM
Creation date
10/11/2023 4:26:35 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
333
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1824 <br />May II. <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />D - <br />F <br />G <br />Hardcover 0-75’ <br />1 - Key <br />2 - I:\isting Inventory’ <br />3 - Proposed Inventory <br />Hardcover 75-250’ <br />1 - Key <br />2 - Existing Inventory <br />3 - Propv’sed In\entory <br />Staff Sketch Defining Top of Bluff <br />Staff Sketch Denoting Structural Setbacks tor Principal Structure <br />Status of Application <br />Tlw Planning Commission tabled Application n\9l5 providing applicant additional time <br />tu amend his improvement plans addressing the following issues; <br />1. Reduction of structural coverage proposed at 1.0%. <br />Prov ide an updated hardcover inventory as members of the Planning Commission <br />felt hardcover within 0-75’ setback area was not complete. <br />3. To also consider additional reductions of hardcover within both setback areas. <br />Members advised that reductions in hardcover could result from removal of additional access <br />stairs in lakeshore vard as a major accessway was provided. <br />Since that review’. Council passed the Bluff Ordinance Amendment redefining the top of <br />bluff. Unfortunately, the top of bluff remains as shown in original packet information. The <br />956’ elevation still defines the top of bluff. <br />Review of Amended Proposal <br />The applicant has reduced the size of the detacted garage addition from 24’ x 27’ to 24’ <br />X 24’ and a staircase has been provided along the outside of the structure. No interior access <br />is proposed. The second story remains as originally proposed. The lakeside ground-level <br />addition also remains as originally proposed with the existing deck being enclosed and the 125 <br />s.f. addition at the southeast comer of structure. The deck has been reduced to half the original <br />area now proposed at 212 s.f. The upper level of deck w ill be approximately 5’ x 32’ but only <br />66 s.f. of deck will result in new hardcover.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.