Laserfiche WebLink
7-oning File #1824 <br />Mav U. 1994m <br />Pa?e 4 of 5 <br />As applicant ’s facts reveal, there has been a rcvhiction in lot area ^^hich has an impact <br />on lot coverage facts and hardcover facts wtwn comparing them to the original facmal <br />information. .An excess of stnictural coverage is still sho\sn at I 6%. The garage side setback <br />has been improved now pn>pi>sed at 7.5', originally at 5'. By moving the garage further wc'^t. <br />the street setback of the garage addition was proposed at 10 ’ and is ns'w shown at 9' llardct>\cr <br />in the 75-250 setback area has been adjusted to include the overhang along the east side of the <br />residence. Remember hardcover wmild only include P's’ of the overhang area (overhang at 3’ <br />width). <br />The top of the bluff is now defined at the 956’ elevation. Note even the garage addition <br />as it is moved southward on the prr*peny falls within the required 30 ’ setback area Review the <br />setbacks to the top of bluff as presented above in the factual rev iew information. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. There is an excess of 1.65c strucmral coverage. The follow ing improvements add <br />to the structural coveraee: <br />Boathouse = 256 s.f. or 1.6% (existing) <br />Second floor deck * 200 s.f. or 1.2% <br />Other reduction in either garage or principal structure additions. <br />Excesses of hardcover exist on the property (refer to Exhibits D-3. E-1 aixl E-3). <br />Note all landscape areas underlain with plastic will be removed but applicant has <br />not removed the additional access stairs as requested by Planning Commission. <br />Refer to Exhibits E-1 and E-3: <br />75-250’ setback area: <br />Area 6 = 35 s.f. or .4% <br />Area 23 = 11 s.f. or .1% <br />0-75 ’ setback area: <br />Area 28 = 25 s.f. or .3% <br />Area 9 = 400 s.f. or 5.1% <br />Area 29 = 11 s.f. or .1% (wood deck) <br />Area 10 (wood deck) = 355 s.f. or 4.5% <br />Area 8 (boathouse) = 256 s.f. or 3.3% <br />Any there other improvements?