Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER % 1995 <br />(#11- #2071 James and Joann Jundt - Continued) <br />Cra'wford his company was only asked to construct, not design, the jM'oject. It is his <br />opinion that this is the tail end of the prefects For the property. <br />Huit noted the number of after-the-fact applications. <br />Mabusth said Staff had asked Kraus /Vnderson for a comprehensive plan but have only <br />received plans in pieces, such as for the greenhouse, the tuckpoiniing, the expansion, etc. <br />No floor plans have ever been seen by Staff. <br />Jabbour said the Kraus Anderson representative, in the company of the Jundt son, was <br />asked two meetings ago for an overall plan The Council then rct^uested the removal ot a <br />small portion of the driveway. He is concerned that with bits and pieces ot a plan, it <br />makes the Council look unreasonable in their reejuests. <br />Kelley asked if the City could ask the applicants to appear before the Council themselves <br />with their application <br />Callahan suggested tabling the application until the overall plan, before and after, has <br />been seen prior to proceeding with this application <br />Hurr moved, Goetten seconded, to table the application until the overall plan is presented <br />and confirmation received that the driveway portion was removed. <br />Callahan received confirmation from Mabusth that the driveway portion had been <br />removed <br />Vote; Ayes 4. Nays 1, Ke!le>-, who felt this application could be approved with the <br />understanding that no further applications would be considered without an overall plan. <br />Crawford said he was concerned with losing the ability to replace the trees if the <br />application was tabled due to upcoming winter weather Mabusth said Staff could work <br />out the tree removal and plantmg issue through a permit GalTfon noted that the plan <br />calls for the removal of a 36“ elm to be replaced with two 4-1/2" maples. Callahan <br />questioned how Staff could approve the tree removal yet it was part of the resolution <br />Mabusth clarified that the tree removal and replanting matters are resolved under a Staff <br />issued permit and that Staff needed Council's approval for the excavation Crawford said <br />the replanting of the trees would only take a couple of days. The dm tree, itself, has <br />already been removed,