My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-23-1995 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1995
>
10-23-1995 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2023 2:07:26 PM
Creation date
10/6/2023 2:04:20 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
326
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
■1 • i <br />MDOrrcS OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITV COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 9, 1995 <br />(•#S) §2067 BRUCE AND TERRY CLARK, 625 OLD LONG LAKE ROAD - <br />VARUNCE - RESOLUTION #3614 <br />Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt Resolution #3614 granting a side setback <br />variance to Bruce and Terry Clark of 625 Old Long Lake Road for construaion of an <br />attached garage Ayes 5. Nays 0. <br />(•#9) #206* PAT AND KATHY SMIEJA, 4040 WATERTOWN ROAD - <br />VARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3615 <br />Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt Resolution #3615 granting approval of <br />setback variances for Pat and Kathy Smieja of 4040 Watertown Road for construction ot <br />a 14*xl6' three-season porch addition and 28*x36* living space/garage addition. Ayes 5, <br />NaysO. <br />(•#10) #2069 CINDY AND STEVE HARRIS, 3850 WATERTOWN ROAD - <br />VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3616 <br />Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt Resolution #3616 granting a variance to <br />Cindy and Steve Harris of 3850 Watertown Road for construction of a swimming pool <br />located nearer the front lot line than the principal residence structure Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />(#11) #2071 JAMES AND JOANN JUNDT, 1400 BRACKETTS POINT ROAD - <br />AMENDED VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3617 <br />i*cotl Crawford of Kraus .Anderson Construction represented the applicants <br />Jabbour immediately suggested tabling the application <br />Goetten commented that the applicants have not responded to the request from the <br />Planning Commission for an overall plan, which has caused the City to get bogged down <br />with numerous applications without a look at the big picture ol the plans tor the property. <br />Goetten said she concurs with the Planning Commission Chair in the need to perse\ ere in <br />obtaining an overall plan. <br />Kellev suggested denying the application. <br />Callahan asked Crawford the reason for not having received a plan from the Jundts. <br />Crawford said it was his understanding that all work for the overall structure has been <br />submitted. He had thought the vana. .e application was complete and then found out <br />differently Hurr said it was not only this structure that has been addressed Crawford <br />said he was unaware of any further requests and has only responded per instructions. <br />Callahan said it was not the number of variances, per se, but the project has been difficult <br />to follow, and was concerned with losing sight ot the overall plan.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.