Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />stress for Starks and Fields- <br />Further, Dr. Neal had nvany rnccnsistencies within his report. <br />For exartple, in his report on Fields, Dr. Neal writes, “He feels <br />angry and frustrated leading to social alienation and avoidant <br />be.haviors-. This is followed, t.hree lines later, by Dr. Neal <br />writing, “He ruxes well and is able to interact and feel <br />comfortable in the compa.ny of others*. Other exairples of these <br />i.nccnsiscencies in Dr. Neal's report are, “...unable to accomplish <br />tasks on a day to day basis* follcwec oy “...energetic, activity <br />oriented and likely to seek out competitive situations*; and “there <br />is some loss of self-confidence* followed by “He is assertive and <br />rather independent". Dr. Neal characterized both Starks and Fields <br />as honest and sincere, knowing that they were disqualified from <br />police 30bs for “inconsistencies" on background investigations. <br />Ex.1000-1003, 1005. Dr. Neal's reports are not entitled to be <br />given significant weig.tt by the court. <br />2. Dr. R. O. Nelsen.Nelsen submitted <br />psychological reports on both Starks and Fields based on extensive <br />interviews, record review and exa.minations. Ex. 2049, 2061 <br />respectively. Dr. Nelsen reported that Starks' clinical profile <br />was within normal limits and that Starks did not report any <br />psychological conflicts or e.moticnal stresses that are providing <br />great difficulty for him at ime. He showed no signs of <br />depress 1 .^4*Dr. Nel.sen determined chat Starks was getting <br />“sufficient satisfaction out of his life at this time". Dr. Nelsen <br />acknowledged t.hat Starks e.xperienced emotional distress from MPRS