Laserfiche WebLink
and ecosionic dantages evaluations cn behalf of plaintiffs. Dr. Neal <br />acknowledged that 50% of his work is forensic, of which the great <br />majority is for plaintiffs. The other 50% is with the chronic <br />mentally ill. Currently, he dees no screening for police <br />departments. Ke offered opinions about plaintiffs' intelligence, <br />despite the fact that .he did no intelligence testing. He offered <br />opinions on their employability, although he did net consult anyone <br />that was an expert in police hiring. In his economic loss report <br />on Starks, Dr. Neal did not include the assumption of expectation <br />of teachers salary, even though it was Starks' plan. He also <br />ingnored the fact that Starks is currently working 40 hours per <br />week for the school district, not the 30 hours he assumed. He <br />agreed that both Starks and Fields had significant employment <br />problems including discipline and termination, although he assumed <br />for his estimate of wage loss t.hat they would immediately obtain <br />police 3obs and hold those jobs to age 65. Dr. Neal made his <br />findings knowing that in order to obtain a police position, the <br />plaintiffs had to pass a written e-xamination, oral examination, <br />background search and psychological evaluation according to POST <br />board regulations, and tha*: plaintiffs had repeatedly failed each <br />of those requirer.ents. <br />while wearing his "psychologist" hat. Dr. Neal found that <br />plai.ntiffs had been upset by tite MFRS testing experience, but he <br />admitted t.hat all of the ether problems disclosed by the background <br />inform.ation. such as :cb renections, 30b discipline and job loss <br />which were not related to MFRS testing would also be causes of