Laserfiche WebLink
di rector for the ci ty of H <br />ed that 44.ik»process <br />tests (?c:» ir» <4* A s4 -ARI) . <br />a r«vi«w of plaintiffs' availaPl# erplo>'Tient; records raised serious <br />•red flag* concerns, such as crininai convictions, marginal <br />academic performance, military reprimands and discharge. <br />JTjesticnabie emplciment history. inappropriate behavior, <br />performance and personality problems and lack of honesty in <br />disclosures. <br />4. John Irakine TeatiaoBy. Erskine has an extensive <br />background in police work, including work as superintendent of the <br />Bureau of Crim.inal Apprehension for 7 years and as the public <br />chfield for 8 years. Erskine <br />for Richfield is comprised of <br />an i.nterview, pyschological <br />evaluation, m.edical exam* and baokground checks, and is completely <br />separate from .MPRS. Erskine testified that from a list of 300 to <br />400 eligible candidates, they would interview only the top 20 to <br />40. Erskine testified that they may reac.h down for protected class <br />m-imjters. Erskine testified he looks for honesty, integrity, <br />demieanor. tem.pera.ment and inconsistencies which would raise <br />questions about these traits. Erskine m.ade a contingent offer of <br />a police position to Starks but wit.hdrew it based on a record that <br />indicated Starks could not be trusted, reservations on the <br />psyc.hological report and the crim.inal record from Bemidi. Erskine <br />testified t.hat Richfield would not rehire Starks as a CSO, and he <br />was not willing to consider Starks for a police position. <br />B. Mental Anguish Claim <br />1. Dr. Robert Neal. Dr. h'eal conducted psychological