My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-28-1995 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1990-1996 Microfilm
>
1995
>
08-28-1995 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2023 12:17:43 PM
Creation date
10/6/2023 12:14:53 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
320
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON AUGUST I4» 1995 <br />(#6 - Richard Hdt • Continued) <br />Kelley referred to Exhibit G and asked how the nei^ibor to the north's property, which is <br />a vacant lot, is accessed. The grave! drive provides the platted ri^-of-way for the <br />access according to Mabusth The lots can still be combined even if this divides it It is <br />maiittained by the City. The vacant lot has been denied as buildable in conceptual review. <br />The owner of the lot's home is located across the street from the property <br />Goetten asked if there was any hardcover ranoval. Mabusth said one section of <br />hardcover would be removed. The Planning Commission had noted erosion problems <br />and recommended the retaining waUs and plastic remain for stabilization This area is <br />located downhill and water drains to it. Ttere is a culvert on the property. A bituminous <br />swale has been suggested to aid the drainage The Planning Commission suggested an <br />ot^neering plan to contain the erosion The resolution notes this suggestion in item 3 of <br />the conclusions. <br />Callahan questioned why the 1988 resolution allowed 3700 s.f of hardcover in the 75- <br />2S0* zone including plastic on the west side and the walkway by the garage and is now at <br />4213 s.f Mabusth said this was because the first application did not include the City <br />turnaround paving. There is now more arai included in the combination of lots in the 75- <br />250' zone. <br />Hurr moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve K solution #3588 per Planning Commission <br />recommendations and conclusions <br />Kelley asked if there was 56 s.f of h?rdrov»^ ncreasc. Mabusth said the structural <br />coverage is the increase but the tota’ ^ . ver is being decreased. <br />Goetten said the coverage should be limited to what is existing now. <br />Ayes 4, Nays 1, Goetten Nay Goetten said there is no justification to add more <br />hardcover. <br />It was noted that no variance was required on the structural coverage. <br />(#7) #2040 DOUG OLSON, 2601 WEST LAFAYETTE ROAD - VARIANCES - <br />RESOLUTION #3589 <br />Dr Olson was present as well as his contractor. Jim Smith <br />Mabusth reported the property contains 800 linear feet of lakeshore. Before the <br />hardcover calculations were dev eloped, extensive areas of hardcover were removed. <br />This includes a 15x15' boathouse and a stone walkway to the peninsula area.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.