08-28-1995 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MlNinXS OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY ’ COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 14, 1995 (#4 - Donald & Aricne Kielley - Continued) Roeiofs asked if in concept the one garage, which encroaches the road, was remo\'ed and the other enlarged, if this would be a feasible alternative It was clarified to Roeiofs that the garage portion that extends into the right-of-way is not figured into the calculations. Jabbour explained the 15®/« lot coverage allowance to the applicant and contractor. Callahan said he would be interested in seeing the concept on paper as he does see the benefit of changing the garage and removing it fi-om the right-of-way. Kielley asked if concrete was counted as hardcover The variances, hardcover, and structural coverage were explained, \labusth said paving was not structure. Paving is hardcover. The allow’able is 15% in building and 25% in hardcover. (i#5) #2036 ROBERT J. GOUNTANIS, 1098 LOMA LINDA AVENUE - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION Callahan moved. Hurt seconded, to refer Application #2036 back to the Planning Commission per the request of the applicant. Ayes 5, Naj’S 0. (#6) #2038 RICHARD HEIT, 1153 ELMWOOD AVENUE - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3588 Contractor for Mr. Heit was present. Mabusth reported the application is for a two story, 10x28 lakeside addition to the residence, located outside of the 0-75 ’ setback but in front of the average lakeshore setback There would be no impact on the neighbor to the south and the other neighbor's residence is located on a higher elevation The expansion woulo of a dining room on the second story and a screened porch and exercise spa on the lower level The side setback variance reejuires an 8" variance with the structural now at 9'6" and proposed at 9'4" There is a hardcover excess on the property It exists at 52% and is proposed at 51% The difierence between this review and one from 1988 is in the paving The paving is located in the City turnaround and was originally counted in the calculations but has now been credited. The applicant's garage is located within the platted right-of-way and the turnaround installed within the applicant's property. The City is asking for legal combination of Lots 19 und 8 Mabusth reported in the Planning Commission review, erosion was noted along the north side of the property. The Engineer has reviewed and recommended tile be extended to the front of the residence, buried, and seeded.