Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 14,1995 <br />(#4 - Donald & Arlene Kielley - Continued) <br />Kelley said it is unknown where the additional hardcover came. The site is limited and <br />the proposed addition exceeds the ruling made. <br />Hurr asked if the garages both contained furnaces and tound that they did. <br />Jabbour said te was concerned with lot density and had a problem with trading <br />something that had been installed without approval. If the applicant wants the new <br />addition, Jabbour said new ideas need ♦.■» be created The lot coverage is the key issue <br />according to Jabbour. <br />Mabusth said the contractor wa- informed that the garage encroaches into the County <br />Road. She also noted that the 19i?. resolution noted the conditions in the chain of tule. <br />The owner at that time wanted to amend the resolution but didn’t proceed with the <br />variance application. <br />KcUey said he would be in favor of the application if the garage that encroaches the <br />roadway be removed. <br />Goetten said there was too much hardcover on the property and should have beer <br />removed with the 1982 resolution. <br />The applicant, Kielley responded, that he has talcen out the rock beds to turn then back to <br />a natural area as well as removed timbers. Kielley said he has taken out twice the amount <br />that he is adding. It was noted that the addition only e.xtends 10 ’ out and a vacant lot is <br />next door to the properly. Kielley also said that the project would allow better drainage <br />on the property if that was an issue. <br />Goetten said drainage is a concern, but hardcover is the issue. The plastic underlayment <br />removal was cited as being no comparison to gaining new structure Goetten said the <br />removal must be structural on this small lot. <br />Kielley said he would eliminate the concrete in the walkway and between the garages and <br />confine the turnaround area. He added that the house is small and the storage in the <br />garages is needed. <br />Hurr informed the applicant that the proposal could be tabled allowing the applicant time <br />to review If Council proceeds and denies the application, the applicant cannot come <br />back with the application for 60 days <br />Callahan moved. Hurr seconded, to continue Application #2033 to the next Council <br />meeting. Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />It was suggested to the applicant that he amend the application.