Laserfiche WebLink
(Staff Presentation - Continued) <br />».«.h., - •- <br />the police depanment, as well as input from the applicant. <br />Gaffron said he asked isrevised to allow this <br />conditional use Statute and ordman . . a ^ If there are no standards. <br />conditional use, there need to be ^peafic s ^ impossible to uphold 'conditional use, there need to be uphold’ in <br />then a denitU of any ”'0^000^1 wer^o m . ^ cnteria and standards <br />;tho^^^^ The Attorney was «ncemed ^socoun. By the same token, if any appbcant were o — concerned also <br />=Ce^to“t^- .He efrL ofl.censin. which <br />GaSfon said the City might not want to get involved in. <br />•%-, M ^ ^ ^ ---------- ^ <br />Peterson asked for specifics. Gafifron said the City Attorney <br />..eked that the k-'ty ^ regarding a Board of Direaors and <br />• A_ :iT^nPAr on 2X1set Barrett noted operation items #3 and #6 regarding a isoara o <br />v^Ui other CUPs but saw the need to know the background of businesses. <br />rediffi-nn ^d items #4 and #5 dealt with a committee that would need to be estabUshed for <br />provided by another city.J ------------------ <br />r.ffron .aid the Attorney thounht #7. renarding City authority to review the CUP in the <br />trad°rJIi^ster the Ucense and any problems that should arise? For example, <br />s " In the shelter, is the City able to deal with <br />This would not be a land use/zoning issue, and zoning staff would not deal with . <br />Peterson said the City did not intend this to be a licensing situation. <br />Gafifon said under the location section of the ordinance, there ^e <br />TVx residential CUP without limitations could encompass most of the City, but the <br />Lifer use^ for all locations. Barrett had suggested that the location <br />limitations should be logical, understandable, and as in the <br />embellished upon why the item was included in the ordmance. and why the q <br />was important.