Laserfiche WebLink
NnNUTCS OFTffi OTY ^ <br />(«, «921 MARY A. ULRICH. 1000 LOMA LINDA AYXNUE - PRELIMINARY <br />SUBDIVISION <br />-f rr nnH noted that staff recommended approval subject to the <br />Gaffron reviewed the statf report and <br />conditions listed in the staff report. <br />Mark Gronberg was preseni oTonberg responded negatively. oLussion <br />:ied°ri;^dingVeT-k dedica" on“e and Gaffron noted that ,t would be 3% of the fau <br />market value of the new lot only. <br />.a u- c ta mihlic bearin'^- no one present wished to speak and the <br />■“•“"" <br />It was moved by Lindquist, seconded LorarUnda Ave^e subject to <br />s»puS;!:ii^s^ Mlt'bsTed in'JLff report and the addition of #12. to require del,neat,on of <br />the wetland along Loma Linda Avenue. Ayes 6, nays 0. <br />#192’ ROBERT AND ELIZABETH MELAMED. 1000 OLD CRYSTAL BAY <br />SOOTH - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION <br />The applicant was not present. Chair S^^roeder moved Lind^i^^^^^^^^ <br />(#4) amendment of section 10.56. SUBDIVISION 3 <br />Gaffron reviewed the ordinance criteria and definitions what <br />ordinal. Staff recommended approval ®f anj others. He <br />Other cities were doing and Gaffron responded ability to make a <br />Wt Lt the City needed to have *at w®tdd g,« <br />determinatton without having to resort to i ,g concerned aboOt eroston and <br />noted that the Depanment of Natural Resource (DNR)^^^^ <br />protection of the lake shore. Lmdqutst commended statf on a wen <br />Chair Schroeder opened the public hearing. was <br />Road were present. Mrs. Swirling stated she felt th erosion and have <br />gwto see Lme changes made. She noted they ave had a that <br />Ld to build retaining walls on the,r property to a>ab,l.ze ,t. Cha r Sc^oeo <br />drainage was always a concern in the Casco Point area and the Planning Lom <br />looking at where it was appropriate to construct houses. <br />(#3)