My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-20-1995 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
11-20-1995 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2023 10:44:03 AM
Creation date
10/5/2023 8:44:35 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
433
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINI THS OF 1HF ORONO PLANNING ( OMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON NO\ EMBER 20, lāW5 <br />(ii| . «2082 Richard Stark - Continued) <br />Mahusth asked the Commissioners if the trees were replaced in the 0-75ā zone and not in <br />the areas described as "A" or "B" Lindquist was told 10 trees would be planted in 0-75' <br />setback area Undquist saw no problem with area "B" but felt area "A" should have <br />replacement of tree for tree Peterson said that would be consistent with other <br />applications <br />Stark questioned tree replacement under tlie agreement tor the easement Mabusth said <br />there was no direction in the code and has been based on the judgment of Staff Tree <br />removal in 0-75' requires permits issued by Staff Mabusth told Stark if he objected to <br />Planning Commission recommendations to present his position before the Council As far <br />as the easement. Mabusth said the agreement stipulates that no trees can be removed <br />without City approval <br />1 here were no public comments <br />Smith said she agreed with Lindquist in his request for tree replacement Lindquist said he <br />felt particnilarly strong about tree replacement in area "A" Stark said he strongly objected <br />to placing trees in this area Stark said there are alot of trees on the property It is not his <br />intent to gain a view of the lake At the time, the property was not open to use of the <br />lake Stark noted that the house, itself, was not in view. <br />Mabusth asked Stark how many trees w ere already dead that were removed. Of the 10 <br />trees removed. Stark said probably half of them were dead Hawn commented that a <br />buckthorn was removed, and she was glad to see that particular tree removed Stark said <br />an oak tree was choking it out <br />Peterson received confirmation that the reroofing project completed without a permit was <br />satisfied <br />Lindquist asked Stark if he would agree to the replacement of 5 trees in area "A". Stark <br />said he would if they could be planted to the side Mabusth commented that tree <br />placement was not an issue as long as plantings were achieved in specified areas. <br />Lindquist moved. Smith seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2082 with 5 <br />trees being replaced in area "A" of similar size, 10 trees replaced in the 0-75ā zone, and <br />granting of a new easement. The tree replacement is to be completed by July 15, 1996. <br />Vote: Aves 5, Navs 0
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.