My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-20-1995 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
11-20-1995 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2023 10:44:03 AM
Creation date
10/5/2023 8:44:35 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
433
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETINCi IIEI.D ON NOVEMBER 20, IW5 <br />(#I - #2082 Richard Stark - Continued) <br />Peterson asked it'there were an> problems with soil erosion Mabusth said there were no <br />problems Peterson asked if the plan to restore trees and vegetation was appropriate with <br />Stafl' Mabusth said the plan was to replant 10 trees in the 0-75' zone Stark said his plan <br />was to plant the trees on the sides of the proi>erty and noted there were no evergreens on <br />the property at this time and that he did not propose replantings in areas A or B <br />Hawn inquired about the use ofMn/'DOT 250 grass and asked if it was appropriate to <br />"weed-wack" these natural grasses Stark had told Hawn that sod would give better <br />control Mabusth asked Stark if it was his intent to cut the grass in the wetland area, and <br />Stark said it was his intent to do so Stark said he asked an expert regarding long grass or <br />natural grass' elTort and was told there w as no difference Stark said "weed-wacking" <br />allows for competition of grasses and a fuller growth of the root structure He noted a <br />disadvantage of long grass was its breeding environment for insects who carry diseases <br />such as Lymes Disease Mabusth said the DNR and MCWD would be able to provide <br />answers to these issues Stark addeded that he did not believe there was any regulatory <br />force concerning grass cutting Mabusth reminded Stark ol the City's conservation <br />easements which limits such activity Peterson commented that the City has always <br />encouraged long natural grass in wetland areas and that "weed-wacking" has never been <br />discussed <br />Smith questioned the planting of fruit trees versus native trees She did not feel that this <br />type of tree was in keeping with a wetland area Smith would like to see trees plantings <br />that are consistent with wetland areas Stark responded that the landscape consultant had <br />suggested the type of trees to be planted in view of the large ^M'lpulation of deer Peterson <br />said the Planning Commission has not stipulated in the past what type of trees should be <br />planted but looked more at the mitigation issue Mabusth commented that evergreens are <br />probably not consistent with wetland areas either Smith agreed that it was probably a <br />personal preference issue. <br />Smith asked about another home nearby which had clear cut some trees. Gafffon said that <br />15-20 trees w ere replanted in the 3"-5" size. The trees were of different varieties. The <br />trees were replaced one for one but not inch for inch. <br />Smith asked if any fine was involved for that application. Gaffron said any fine would <br />have been so small as money would be spent to replace the trees. <br />Lindquist noted that only certain type of trees would grow in wetland areas. Stark said it <br />was his plan to place the trees along the sides of the property and not in the wetland area. <br />r • *1 'T
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.