11-20-1995 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINI' rr.S OF THK ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Ml LUNG HLLDON NOVLMBLR 20. IW5 (#7 - «2050 MCWD - Continued) Smith moved. Lindquist seconded, to approse Application ^2059 with the provision that the punch list be addressed by MCWD with StalTand to Start’s satisfaction, and any special changes to the si/e or scope (specifically, the Medina and Pearce projects) would require future reconsideration b\ the Planning ('ommission V ote Ayes 5. Nays 0. <#S) )(2078 JENSEN HOMES INC., 405 TONKAWA ROAD - PRELIMINARY SCBDI\ ISION - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - 10:02-10:15 P.M. The Applicam w as present Mabusth reported that the .^0' easement along the stiuth property line has been located The easement has been deducted form the total lot area and is now at 3.07 acres The property is to be developed with rural standards due to the septic There is a backlot configuration but the west lot is not a back lot there is access to the public road to the south Mabusth said the County will not approve any new curb cuts and will require a sliared driveway for lot 2, and lot I may continue to use existing access The applicant had no comment Peterson asked if the applicant was aware that the third curb cut would not be allowed and received a reply to the atfirmative Lindquist inquired if there was to be any park or trail acquisition. Mabusth said the Park Commission has not reviewed the application but will at their December 4 meeting During public comments, Barry Knight, 425 Tonkawa, said he had no problem with the subdivision. He did, howev er, have a concern with the Staff recommendation for condition #I H? noted that since his property is not a back lot, but under back lot standards, item #I would relate to his property and should not be included He was told that item #1, which refers to no more than two residences on one driveway, is a City ordinance and must be part of the conditions. Knight said the deeded access is not exclusive and w ould benefit the division of other lots. If he were to subdivide in the future, which he said he has the right to do, this would affect him, and he should be part of that code Knight was informed that if he should subdivide in the future, the code would need to be applied The parcels in question are not in the MUSA, while Knight's property is within the MUSA. 20