My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-20-1995 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
11-20-1995 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2023 10:44:03 AM
Creation date
10/5/2023 8:44:35 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
433
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINI THS OK THK: ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />mi:lhng hildon novlmblr 20.1995 <br />(#7 - «2059 NK'WD - Continued) <br />Peterst'»n asked if a drag line vsould be used LaBounty said the work would be done by <br />backhtK Because of winter construction, smaller equipment can be used <br />Haven asked if it was impossible to control the point source of the pollution from the <br />upstream feedlots l^aBounty said the majonty of pollution comes from non-point source <br />over a long period of time The NK'VVD is w orking with Medina and Orono on a <br />cooperative agreement which will use include of "best management practices" <br />Stormwater management plans, when they are dev eloped by each city, will contain the <br />best management practices <br />Hawn asked what are the time lines for the cities’ stormwater plans LaBounty said the <br />stormwater plans should have been in by this time as the two y ear time allotment has <br />expired The M( WD is working with Long Lake on their stormwater plan at this time <br />and hopes to do the same with Medina and Orono <br />Hawn said she w as concerned if the lake w as cleaned of the existing phosphorus, it would <br />be reintroduced creating the same problems LaBounty said would be removed and <br />would result in less internal loading, adding that the alum treatment would aid in <br />alleviating the pioblem <br />Smith asked if the City could stipulate that the application come back before the Planning <br />Commission if the project does not go forward as proposed It was noted that the normal <br />time frame of reviewing an application is one year while the project is not set for another 3 <br />years GatVron said if Planning Commission wishes to extend the approv al time frame, <br />some type of trigger could be placed in the permit to allow the application to be revisited <br />LaBounty requested that the permit be issued for a longer time period as long as there are <br />no changes Mabusth said that the approval conditions could specify guidelines as to what <br />changes would prompt it to be back for review LaBounty asked that the permit use any <br />changes to the Deerhill Pond as a trigger to come back before the Planning Commission. <br />He noted that the agreement w ith Pearce has some leeway for the si/e of the pond <br />LaBounty asked if the |>ermit should be held until a time clo.ser to the aciual construetion, <br />as long as there is an understanding that the construction will go forward He noted the <br />completion date is about 2-1/2 years out Smith felt it could be completed now and only <br />come back if there w ere major changes in the plans Lindquist agreed. It was noted that <br />both judges on the Medina suit have promised a conclusion by December I Since it <br />would be appropriate for Orono's Council to know the Medina outcome before acting, <br />GalTron will drafi a resolution to present before the Council in January. LaBounty <br />concurred with this schedule <br />i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.