01-17-1995 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 17, IW (#S > #1987 Lmy Pillar - Continued) The Applicant was present M^busth reported that the applicatiem tnvoh^ a 10^15' additkHi to the mr a home that was instafled without a buildii^ permit The apphcaitt's intention was to repair sections of the foundation of the three-souon porch, winch also provides an intoior access to the basement vea, and found he nceM to replace foimdations, the wood fiaine walls and rot>f The addition was rebuilt within the origin^ enve lope. AppKcant advised that he has been working on thb profect for a few months The inspectors isaied a stop work order, and applicant was advised of the need fbr a buildif^ permit and survey The sinvey leveaM the porch was 47” fhMn the side lot line The house is 4' Iran said line There is a 14* unimproved alley which sqwiites applicaiit's fiom the property to the i»rth. if the alleyway was vacated, this pit^)erty would receive the benefit of the eventual 14* wide alley Lindquist nroved, Berg seconded, to approve Application #1987 to include a penalty fee for not havii^ acquired a buiidii^ permit and tind addition be completed within 90 days. Ayes 7, Nays 0. !l was noted that the shed on the property was not found on the survey and is located on the property line. The vacating of tlK alley would solve this problem. (M) #19St KENNETH J. SEVERINSON* 2800 SHADYWOOD ROAD • VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING > 8:404:50 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were nofed. The Applicant was present. Mabusth reported that the application is fm* a setback variance required for reinstaliation of new wetions, 6-7 in height, of a privacy fence adjacem to the soulhw^ channel side and street side of the property. The original fence continued approximately 8* fiuther along the duumet than the new fence The Applicant said he was unaware of the need for a permit It was discovered after 78*4 of the fence had been replaced. The fence is in the 0-75* zone and is not considered hardcover. The Applicant said the noise level of the area without the (nivacy fence is vary loud and is part of his harddiip statemem. Peterson and Smith were concerned with approving a fence here and settii% a precedent for oclwrs to ftdlow as a reason to grant a future request for fencii^. There were no public comments.