My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-17-1995 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
01-17-1995 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2023 3:29:07 PM
Creation date
9/27/2023 3:25:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HEl D ON JANUARY 17, 1995 <br />(#3 - #I9S1 Todd R Couitieva - Continued)! <br />Nolan movecL Rowlene sax^idai, to if^irove Applkatitni #1981 subject to review and <br />accefMttioe h>- the City of a professional drainage |dan, a comprehensive landscape <br />stabilization plan, ta wefl as an ox>»oa control plan reopnring perkKfic imyectioiis by the <br />City Engineer Ayes 6, Nays I. Smith South's opinion is that the plan should move the <br />house away from the smaller hill. <br />(#4) «I«M DAVID YORKS, 2825 CASCO POINT ROAD - AFTER-THE-FACT <br />CONDITIONAL DSC PERMIT/V'ARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - 8:20-8:30 <br />P.M. <br />The Affidavk of Pubficatkm and Cotiiicate of Mailii^ were imted <br />Kfrs. Yorfcs was present. <br />Schroeder read a letter addressed to the CHy from Dave Stockdale of Edgewori Buttders, <br />the contractor for the appheation, to be included as part of the public record, stipulating <br />confirmation that proper construction procedures were followed for the retaining wall as <br />required by the City. <br />Mabusth said the application was an emer^ncy situation that devek^wd after the <br />November Piaimii^ Commission meeting requiring the City to make a decision without <br />firA ccMnii^ before the Conunissicn and Council for approval It was discovered that the <br />retaining wall at the top of the bank leading to the lake was in a near state of collapse and <br />measures needed to be taken immediately to safeguard bank before spriiig thaw and rains. <br />The contractor failed to call for inspections during the reconstruction of waOs, although, <br />contractor did work with the City Ei^ineer on the project. Since inspections would not <br />confirm that the wall had been installed as required, the Engineer asked that a letter be <br />aibmitted for the record. <br />There wo-e no public comments. <br />Rowlette fdt there should be no after-the-fiKk penahy due to the circumstaiKes. <br />Rowlette, moved, Nolan seconded, to approve Application #1986 for an afier-the-ftet <br />conditiorud use permit and setback variance for retaining wall with the recommendation <br />that no penalty be assessed. Ayes 7, Nays 0. <br />(#5)#1987 LARRY PILLAIL 2705 ETHEL A VENUE - VARIANCE - PUBLIC <br />HEARING - 8:30-8:40 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.