Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />MINLITES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON JANLFARY 17, I<»5 <br />(#2 - #1975 Larrv Anhah - Cofttimied) <br />The Pfauinii^ Commis^men vmced their approvid of tMs land use sayii^ it was <br />consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. Nolan hrougitt up the number of parkii^ <br />sta'Js needed for this us^ M^iuAh said this woi^ be studied as pait of tlK conditional <br />use permic proce» <br />Neighbor, Bill Wear, of 2160 Wayzata Blvd , said he was concerned with the curb cut <br />He feeb A is too close to his property aiKl should be relocated Otherwise, he finds the <br />applicMion to be satisfiK:tory ClifT Often, the property owner to the immediaie west <br />noted his support and approval of the application. <br />Peterson moved. Smith seconded, to approve Apfdication #1975, with the findii^ that the <br />applicant complies with the B1 zoning code and amendment two of the Comprehensive <br />nan. The applicant oust come b«;k before the cenurassion with a formal conditional use <br />permit and commercial site plan, rezoning and subdivision application. The comnnssion <br />reafiirmed for applicant that the City will expect the designation of a fiiture connection <br />road to North Brown Road at the lime of the platting of Outlot F Ayes 7, Nays 0. <br />#l9tl TODD R. COliRNEYA, 4620 TONKA VIEW LANE - VARUNCE - <br />CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING -1:00-0:20 P.M. <br />The Applicant was present <br />Mabusth said the Applicant has come back with a new plan which does not encroach the <br />btulT area The proposed house has been downsized, and the gan^ has been relocated to <br />the west side and reduced to two stalls. The proposed house %vill be located 25’ from the <br />street lot line where 35' is required. The setback from the existing traveled road wifi be <br />46' and at 42' if Tortkaview Road is upgraded at 28' width, as proposed by the City <br />Engineer. The setback from the l(/ grassed boulevard of the upgraded road is 32' fttm <br />the north side, where 35' is required. <br />Peterson, who was one of three commissioners who reviewed this application at the laat <br />meeting, recalled that if a variance was to be needed, preference was to the street aide and <br />not to the bhifT area side. A main concern was with the drainage for the proposed plan. <br />Rowlettte was concerned that no water goes down the hill on the she. Nohui said a <br />landscape stabilizatkH) plan would be needed along with a drainage plan designed by a <br />prcdessional engineer. Smith is concerned with the patio and the placement of the building <br />over the smaller hill.