Laserfiche WebLink
MIHUTBS OP THE PUJOIIK CONHISSIOII <br />iU >• <br />VllG I I -«F#MKiai 21, 198t <br />#1233 MIOAEL HALLBT BOMBS COMTII <br />Chairnan Kelley stated he is in favor of restoring the <br />retaining walls but opposed to allowing the drainage <br />pipe. <br />Johnson agreed that the pipe would not have <br />significant impact and would support the proposal. <br />a <br />Brown agreed with Kelley finding it would be setting a <br />precedent by allowing a drainage pipe. <br />It was moved by Chairman Kelley* seconded by Bellows* to <br />recommend denial of the CUP/variance for the drainage <br />pipe within the 75* lakeshore; and recosaiend approval of <br />the CUP/variance to reconstruct the retaining walls <br />within the 75* lakeshore subject to no additional <br />hardcover incurred by retaining walls. <br />Johnson felt that the revised plan was a couch better <br />plan than originally submitted. He suggested that <br />applicant could direct the drainage to the rear of the <br />house instead of directly to the lake. <br />Mabusth agreed suggesting the wetland area. <br />Mr. Kollmeyer stated that the wetland is outside of the <br />property. <br />Chairman Kelley stated he did not feel this was a good <br />design for the property because eventually grading of <br />the the lakeshore bank would be desired. <br />Motion* Ayes 3* Nays 1. Johnson voted nay. Motion <br />carried. <br />#1247 ROBERT POSTHOMOS <br />RECORD LOT HO. 40 - BIG ISLAHD <br />VARIAHCE <br />SBCan) REVIEW <br />Applicant was not present for this matter. <br />Jacobs explained the request for a side setback variance <br />to construct a lake home; and a variance and conditional <br />use permit to install a well within 75* of the <br />lakeshore. It was noted that the restricted septic site <br />affects the well and house location* therefore <br />requiring the need for the variances and conditional use <br />permit. The hardships being the lot size and septic <br />location.