Laserfiche WebLink
MMons or m plmwiig connxssxoi wmertm MUKai 21» IMi <br />11247 POSTHl IS COMTIMIB) <br />Gaffron explained that there are many record lots on Big <br />Island that were granted the right to use the property <br />for seasonal use* many of which are substandard and <br />required variances. <br />There were no comments from the public. <br />It was moved by Chairman Kelley« seconded by Johnson, to <br />recoiranend approval as proposed per staff's findings and <br />conditions. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />fi24s TBoms mxxzjMs <br />4127 OAE STBKR <br />VABIJUKBS <br />POBUC BKASIMS t:51-8:57 <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Nailing <br />were noted. <br />Thomas Williams was present for this matter <br />Mabusth explained the request for a lot area and lot <br />width variance for an undeveloped 3 lot parcel. Staff <br />finds no problem with the building envelope as indicated <br />on the plan. <br />Chairman Kelley stated he would like to see Lots 1 4 2» <br />Block 5 combined with Lot 1, Block 4, including the <br />vacation of Ridge Place between the lots. <br />Charles Hommeyer, 4125 Oak Street, was opposed to <br />vacating Ridge Place because it would eliminate the need <br />to adhere to the 35* road setback requirement, and allow <br />a larger building envelope for that lot. <br />Mabusth noted that because of the existence of the sewer <br />pipes, she did not feel the City would consider vacating <br />Ridge Place. <br />There were no other comments from the public and the <br />public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Johnson, to <br />recommend approval of the lot area and lot width <br />variances per staff recommendation, subject to the <br />condition that the building envelope as described on the <br />plan being maintained. <br />Mr. Hommeyer asked about the status of upgrading Oak <br />Street because of the addition of a fourth residence to <br />be served by this private road.