My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-21-1996 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
10-21-1996 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2023 11:53:05 AM
Creation date
9/14/2023 11:48:50 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
237
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #2180 <br />October 15, 1996 <br />Page 2 <br />3.Section 10.25, Subd. 6(B) - Street setback variance for principal structure addition. <br />Required = 30' <br />Existing = 32’ <br />Proposed = 8’ (traveled road 14-15' from street lot line) <br />Variance = 22' or 73% <br />Description of Request <br />Applicants seek approval of multiple variances to permit construction of a 24'x24' garage addition <br />to the street side.of the existing residence. The majority of garage structure will be placed over an <br />existing 19’x32' bituminous/gravel drive. The structural improvements include a second story over <br />the existing single stor>' walkout structure. Note existing structure meets all required setbacks of the <br />LR-IC Zoning District. Appli ants also propose a three level 24'xl6' addition at the lake side of the <br />residence with a connecting deck to the north at 13'xl4'. Note the lake side additions will also meet <br />the average lake shore setback, and 75 ’ setback. <br />Refer to Exhibit H, the additions result in an excess of structural coverage of 3.4%. Hardcover in <br />the 75-250' setback area is increased by either 3.3% (Option 1) or 6.2% vOption 2). Applicants <br />contractor in his report. Exhibits FI-2, notes two options for an access drive. Option 1 would have <br />doors facing out to street with a drive at approximately 8'xl 8’ in width. Applicants' contractor failed <br />to provide a site plan for Option 2 but Option 2 would involve doors facing south with a drive <br />located within street yard. Review Exhibit G, note survey shows traveled road 14-15* from street <br />lot line of property, fhe second level addition will provide expanded bedroom area. The main level <br />of the lake side addition will provide a family room with raised or atrium ceiling extending to second <br />level. Note upp^r level study railing area will look out over lower level family room <br />Refer to Exhibit H, the retaining walls within lakeshore yard w ill be removed. The remainder of the <br />existing drive will be removed along the north side of the proposed garage addition. Planter and <br />concrete walk areas at the street side of the residence will be removed. <br />Statement of Hardship <br />Please refer to Exhibit D, applicants no’e lot is located on quiet cul-de-sac with no through trafiic. <br />Actual traveled road is located 14-15' from street lot line. Applicants' Option 2 would use majority <br />of street yard for backout purposes. Existing house is a small two bedroom rambler and growing <br />family needs require additional bedroom area. The house currently has a single stall garage that shall <br />be used as storage area. All other improvements will meet the required setbacks of the zoning <br />district and no improvements existing or proposed are witliin the 0-75 ’ setback area. Applicants <br />contend proposed additions will be consistent with pattern of development within their immediate <br />neighborhood.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.