My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-18-1989 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
09-18-1989 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2023 9:07:01 AM
Creation date
9/13/2023 3:32:45 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MIVOTBS OF TBS PLMmiHG CCBIMISSIOn MBBTIH6 SBPTBMBBR 18, 1989 <br />ZOHIVG PILE «1455-JU[JAH lARSOM CCMTITOBD <br />trees on the property in addition to the 38" oak tree. Mr. <br />Larson also said that locating the hourse elsewhere may also <br />create a problem with hardcover due to the need to make the <br />driveway longer. He said that locating the house as proposed <br />makes use of the more undesireable portions of the property. He <br />said locating the house so that it extends onto Lot 10 would use <br />portions of the property that would be best as lawn and tree <br />area. <br />Planning Commissioner Brown asked if there would be a need <br />for any variance if the applicant chose Option A. Gaffron <br />confirmed that no variance would be required. <br />Mr. Dick Hanson, 3826 Cherry Place, said that he had <br />reviewed Mr. Larson's plans and believes that the house would fit <br />very nicely. <br />Mr. Larson said that he preferred to use Option B as it <br />would allow for the most clearance from the tree. <br />Planning Commissioner Hanson said that he too would view <br />this as a "fresh start" and believed that Mr. Larson could <br />develop a plan chat would not require a variance. <br />Mr. Larson agsln stated that if he constructed the home in <br />such a way to require no variance, then hardcover would Increase. <br />Planning Commissioner Cohen pointed out that Option A did <br />not require a variance. <br />Mr. Larson said that would only allow 3' between the house <br />and the oak tree. <br />Planning Commissioner Bellows said that in her opinion. <br />Option B did not allow enough room between the house and the tree <br />either. She said that in order to build the house, there would <br />be a need to excavate much closer to the tree than 5'. <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this matter <br />and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Planning Commissioner Hanson, seconded by <br />Planning Commissioner Brown, to recommend denial of the side <br />setback variance to construct a new residence. Motion, Ayes»6, <br />Nays»0, Motion passed. <br />#1456 ROBERT & JAMET BMFIBLD <br />2240 DEVIH LABE <br />AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCE <br />PUBLIC HEARING 8:45 P.M. TO 8:46 P.H. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were <br />duly noted. <br />Mrs. Emfield was present for this matter, as were Mr. and
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.