Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #2144 <br />June 12, 1996 <br />Page 2 <br />B.75-250’ setback area = 15,700 s.f. <br />Allowed = 3,925 s.f. or 25% <br />Existing = 4,000 s.f. or 25.4% <br />Proposed by ^plicants = 3.5% s.f. or 22.9% <br />Staff proposed = 3,684 s.f. or 23.4% <br />No variance required. <br />C.Total hardcover on property <br />Total area = 23,200 s.f. ± <br />Proposed * 4,198 s.f. or 18% <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Application <br />B - Plat Map <br />C - Property Owners List <br />D - Neighbor's Acknow ledgment Form <br />El-2 - Hardcov'er Statement <br />F - Hardcover In^•ento^y <br />G - Survey <br />H - West/Street Elevation <br />I - East/Lake Elevation <br />Review of Application <br />Applicants propose the realignment of a section of roof at the lake side of the residence. The <br />reconstruction will also result in an expansion of the roof or building envelope of structure located <br />within the 0-75' setback requiring approvals of setback and hardcover variances within the lakeshore <br />protected area. All other additions proposed at the street side of the residence meet the required <br />setback. Excessive hardcover exists within the 75-250' setback area at 25.4%. Applicants have <br />proposed major reductions in hardcover specifically by reducing area of driveway. Staff would <br />strongly recommend against reduc ing area of driveway as proposed by applicants with a 4'x 16' apron <br />extending from new garage addition with the remainder ot drive at an 8' width. Staff recommends <br />a minimum backout pad at 20'xl0’ width and would strongly encourage a small apron to allow for <br />turn around because of the length of the drive. This can be achieved without exceed allowed 25%. <br />Applicants do not propose additional hardcover in the 0-75' setback where 6.8% exists. The only <br />improvement in the 0-75' involves the expanded roof for the living room addition.