Laserfiche WebLink
July 12,1996 <br />Page 9 <br />#2154 John O’Sullivan, 2380 Shadywood Road • Sketch Plan Review <br />building footprint is 4,300 s.f.. Office building footprint is 9750 s.f. and <br />the AutoTeller canopy footprint is approx. 3300 s.f. for a total lot <br />coverage of 17,350 s.f. or 23% w/o vacation, 20% with vacation. Is <br />there any justification for applicant to request a lot coverage <br />variance? <br />Site Grading/Filling: The topography of the site is rather severe, and might be <br />more suitable for a rear walkout situation rather than the single level <br />buildings depicted in the elevation views. Perhaps the one item of most <br />concern to staff is the apparent need for an extensive retaining wall <br />between the stormwater pond and the buildings. The site plan presented <br />does not get into site gradingTilling needs, but it appears that much filling <br />would be necessarv' at the center of the site to accomodate the proposed <br />buildings. The formal commeercial site plan application submittals should <br />include a detailed site grading/filling plan in addition to grading plans, <br />and show details of all necessarv retaining walls. <br />3. Miscellaneous <br />Legal Combination Required: Since the property currently exists as 4 separate <br />tax parcels, legal combination will be required prior to issuance of any <br />building permits. <br />- 'Sinele Building' Status: Oror Code Section 10.03 Subd. 7 allows only one <br />principal building on a property. Staffs initial reaction to the proposed <br />plan was that it shows two distinct buildings. However, we are advised <br />by the Building Official that from a Building Code standpoint the roof <br />connection between the two buildings over the AutoTellers makes them <br />a single building Absent this attachment, they would be considered as <br />two principal buildings, would have to be on two separate lots, and would <br />be subject to separate setback standards, etc. <br />PUD Not An Alternative: An alternative not available to the developer at this <br />time would be to develop the site as a PUD; this would potentially make <br />development of the site a bit more flexible. However, the Zoning Code <br />does not allow commercial PUD development e.xcept within the <br />Highway 12 Corridor. <br />Location of Proposed Sidewalk/Bike Path : <br />a. Along Shadywood Road; The City has no plans at this time to extend <br />the existing sidewalks northward along Shadywood into the residential <br />area. The sidewalk currently ends at the north end of the site. <br />b. Connection to Olive Avenue; The proposal includes a new bike & <br />walking path along the north boundary of the property adjacent to