02-20-1996 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #2107 February 14, 1996 Page 4 The City would vacate the entire right-of-^v'ay. The City staff and applicant should deterge the boundary of the vacation at the northeast. In lieu of giving up the road nght-of-way, the City %vill ask for additional retention area in the stormwater pond proposed in the residential property to the northeast. It is necessarv' that the City seek out additional retention areas to store and treat runoff- before it enters into the designated wetlands within the area. The current stormwater lines dram directly into wetlands without providing treaunent. Review of Commercial Site Plan and Conditional Use Permits The B-1 property currently houses a motor fuel station with car repair. To the rear of the stahon there is an outdoor storage yard where the previous owner had stored vehicles for City. The maioritv of the eastern portion of the properly as it extends towards the designated w etland w as filled during 'the tornado of the early 60 ’s. Any new construction will require soil tenngs to determine design and type of foundation. The former use has been a low intensity use at this busy intersection. The new owner and applicant proposes the construction of a sit-dovvn restaurant of approximately 99 seat capacitv with drive-up window. The Culver restaurants can be found in Wisconsin, Illinois and Iowa. The restaurant will be connected to a convenience store offering a similar selection of products as O’Sullivans across the street including coffee, cold drinks, bakery items, rojl-o-gn products and cold sandwiches. The convenience store will have eight fueling points under a ful canopy. In a separate building along the east lot line, a mini-tunnel senice car w^h at approximately 2,100 s.f is also proposed. All stmetures meet the required o5 setback ^^^ept for Ac car wash Aat will be located 5' from the rear lot line adjacent to the residential zone. Note the gas canopy meets the 35' setback from the street side lot line. fhe following issues must be resolved by both the City and applicant before the application can proceed for final action before the Council. l.and Use Review die permitted uses listed under Subdivision 3 and the conditional uses under Subdtvision 4. Both the convenience store and the restaurant would be considered permitted principal uses on a propeny The car wash is not listed but review Section 10.40, Subd. 5. is the car wash an accessory or principal use? Refer specincally to F entitled Incidentals. The principal structure consists of 5461 s.f 30% of that total area is 1,638.3 s.f. The car wash is 2,160 s.f. Are we dealing w^t^ or four principal uses on the single property? We would have an easier task tf the City had a commercial PUD Code for the Navarre area. Standards for a single pnncipal use on a property > be inadequate when dealing with multiple uses such as what is being proposed. The applicant would ask the City to consider the multiple use facility at O'Sullivans consisting of le con«n ”Le store, gas station, car repair and car wash. Parking and on-site traffic are major