My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-20-1996 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
05-20-1996 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/7/2023 2:45:57 PM
Creation date
9/7/2023 2:41:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
'W'’-------- <br />Zoning File #2136 <br />May 14, 1996 <br />Page 3 <br />Hennepin County DOT has asked for additional dedications of right-of-way for County Roads <br />19 and 84. The City shall approve the dedication of additional right-of-way for County Road <br />19 or North Shore Drive and deny the request for County Road 84 or Bayside Road. The <br />County also notes that North Shore Drive is slated for a future bike trail. The City’s <br />comprehensive bike trail plan has also designated a bike trail along North Shore Drive and <br />Bavside Road. <br />Lot Conflguration <br />The lots are long and irregular-shaped. It may be difficult for the future owners of Lots 2, 3 <br />and 4 to determine the location of their boundaries in their south yards. Lot 4's building pad <br />is restricted by of a Type 1 wetland in the south yard, septic sites in the middle of the lot and <br />a possible detention/sediment pond between septic and wetland. <br />It is the City's policy to not exclude the area of the Type 1 wetland from the dry buildable <br />area of a rural lot. The wetland area designated by the City is to be excluded from the dry <br />buildable. <br />The existing residence on Lot 6 meets the required setbacks of zoning district (50' front and <br />rear, 30' sides). <br />Lots 1, 3 and 4 require lot width variances. If approved, members must support <br />recommendation with necessary findings and hardships. <br />Grading/Drainage/MCWD Permit <br />Review Exhibits G and I, Gustafson reports approval of the grading plan as proposed. He asks <br />that the drainageway extending from the cul-de-sac to the sediment pond be shown as a <br />drainage easement at a minimum width of 15'. In earlier discussions with the Engineer, we <br />noted a possible need to provide a small sediment pond at the base of the drainage facilities <br />to be installed along the west side of Outlot B within Lot 4. Although road will not be <br />installed by this developer, the drainage resulting along the west side of the graded road may <br />need to be detained and treated before entering wetlands to south. The Minnehaha Creek <br />Watershed District may require the sediment pond. Applicant may be able to obtain additional <br />treatment area within property to the east since the eastern property owner will receive all <br />benefit from the future road within Outlot B. <br />Review Exhibit J, the approved access plan by Hennepin County. Lots 5 and 6 are to gain <br />access via the shared drive at the mutual lot line. Review specifically Lot 6. There is a need <br />to maintain a 20' setback from the drainfield and 26’ from the wetland. The City shall ask for <br />a detailed site plan locating access drive to serve existing residence to ensure setbacks will be <br />met.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.