My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-09-1996 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1996
>
09-09-1996 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2023 12:28:35 PM
Creation date
9/5/2023 12:25:41 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
334
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
page 1 of 3 <br />RE: Internal Trails in Old Crystal Bav Road Addition (Dickev Prooertvi <br />PETITION FOR VACATION OF TRAIL EASEMENTS <br />BY THE RESIDENTS OF COUNTRYSIDE DR. WEST <br />We. the residents of Countryside Drive West of Orono MN., respectfully request that <br />the City of Orono vacate the following three designated trail easements: 1) Between lot <br />#2 and lot #3 within block 2 of the Old Crystal Bay Road addition; 2) Between lot #6 and <br />lot #7 within Block 2 of the Old Crystal Bay Road addition; and. 3) Between lot 6. Block <br />2 of the Old Crystal Bay Road second addition and Lot 1, Block 1 of the Old Crystal Bay <br />Road addition. <br />As citizens of Orono, we respect and fully support the City Council's intent to provide <br />public access to the existing Luce Line trail, and to the proposed public park in Outlet A. <br />However, as access is already provided for bo h the public and residents of <br />Thoroughbred Meadows via: 1) the asphalt trail, which runs along Old Crystal Bay <br />Road and connects with the Luce Line: and, 2) Watertown Rd. which provides access <br />to Outlet A, we believe that additional access via internal trails is unnecessary. <br />In addition, we feel that the internal trail easements, orig.nally designated as <br />"amenities" to the development, are. in fact, a detriment for tne following reasons; <br />The trails would increase the automobile traffic on a 2 lane, cul-de-sac road with a <br />high concentration of children and no on-street parking capacity - this creates a <br />safety concern. We already have vehicles parking on our street in order to access <br />the Luce Line and have experienced some "near misses" with our children. We <br />believe that internal trail access will exacerbate this problem. <br />This street is not a public street maintained by the Orono tax base. If the trails are <br />constructed at the behest of the city of Orono, pliability for accidents, injuries or <br />property damage associated with traffic on this street that is in any way associated <br />with non-resident use of the trails must evolve to the city of Orono. with full <br />indemnification provided to the property owners by the city of Orono. <br />The Luce Line trail is unquestionably utilized by a large number of non-Orono <br />residents. It is. therefore, our belief that the internal trails would also be utilized by a <br />large number of non-Orono residents. The resulting increase in pedestrian and <br />bicycle traffic through the heart of the development would negatively impact the <br />privacy of the residents. More importantly, we believe it could impact the security of <br />the neighborhood. <br />Further, the deterioration of this neighborhood ’s quality brought about by it’s use by <br />non-residents, and the aforementioned safety, privacy and security issues, must <br />result in a substantial and inimediate reduction in each property owner ’s property <br />tax valuation.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.