Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY’ COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JULY 22,1996 <br />(#4 - #2134 Robert Albrecht - Continued) <br />Jabbour moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the resolution as presented with the change <br />in language wording as noted. He noted, if the motion were to fail, the next motion <br />would be to table the application. Hurt asked if there was any time frame to which the <br />hardcover restrictions would be limited Gaffron said no time frame was set but it could <br />be. Hurr said, if the motion were to pass, she would recommend a time frame be <br />indicated Vote Ayes 2, Kelley, Jabbour, Nays 3, Goetten. Callahan, Hurr Motion <br />failed Jabbour moved, Callahan seconded, to table the application to allow the applicant <br />to consult with his attorney in respect to the deniaJ action Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. The <br />application is tabled to the August 12 meeting of the Council. <br />(#5) #2136 GREENFIELD CORPORATION, 180 NORTH SHORE DRIVE WEST <br />- PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - SECOND AMENDED PLAN <br />Laurie Lundeen and Mark Gronberg were present. Lundeen asked the Council members <br />if they had been on the site. Goetten said she has been there but not actually w alked it. <br />Kelley said he had been there many times. Jabbour and Callab.an have also visited the <br />site. <br />Mabusth reported that the applicant has provided an amended plan based on <br />recommendations made by the Council. The original plan proposed a private road with <br />cul-de-sac, and the first amended plan proposed a configuration of private road with <br />driveway outlot. The second amended plan proposes a 30' wide driveway outlot to serve <br />lots 1, 3, and 4 only. There are no lot width variances required with the amended plan. <br />The t wner of Outlot C, Bayv iew Farms, Second Addition, has been advised of the <br />change. A private driveway for that subdivision would be intailed within outlets B and <br />D. <br />Callahan asked if the Staff had any problems with the proposal. Mabusth responded that <br />the current proposal will not require lot standard variances. She also responded to a <br />previous concern of the Council on why the Staff was so concerned with a road outlot <br />being dedicated within this plat. Mabusth said the northeast access would serve as besty <br />access for a future N/S through road This was the City's opportunity to plat sections of <br />a future road w'hen surrounding properties are developed. Access from the west would <br />benefit Waukman, as he too would be able to maintain views to lake and open space <br />areas. Waukman was informed of this agenda item on the meeting and asked to attend if <br />he had further concerns. <br />Jabbour asked how this applicant could be expected to carry forwar'^ with the needs of <br />another development. Staff responded that this is the basis for planning for future needs. <br />It is Staffs responsibility to address these issues.