Laserfiche WebLink
MLNUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CIT\’ COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON JULY 22, 1996 <br />ZONLNG ADMINISTRATORIS REPORT <br />(*#3) #2025 MICRAEL PLANK, 4115^TERTO\VN ROAD, FINAL <br />SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTIOi\#374l <br />\Jabboar moved, Hurr seconded; to adopi-^^olution #3741 of the plat of Maple Place <br />Second Addition. Vote; Acyes 5, Nays 0. <br />(#4) #2134 ROBERT ALBRECHT, 1810 SaVDV'VVOOD ROAD - AFTER-THE- <br />FACT VARLANCE <br />The applicant was present <br />Gaflfiron reported that the Council at their July 8 meeting had conceptually approved an <br />after-the-fact hardcover variance. A draft resolution with conditions and requiring <br />appropriate after-the-fact fees was presented to the Council with the advisory that the <br />property had reached its hardcover limit. GafEron referred to the resolution, item #3 on <br />page 4 of 6. The applicant had no further comments. <br />Goetten asked that the resolution be clear in its language regarding no further hardcover <br />on the propert>' and asked the attorney to review it. She questioned whether the <br />language was as forceful as it could be. She noted that the July 8 minutes lacked her <br />notation that no further hardcover would be allowed on the property and the property has <br />reached it hardcover limits She asked that the minutes be amended to reflect this. <br />Barrett said the draft did attempt to say what was intended but was not presuming to bind <br />a future Council as it did not have the authority to do so. Goetten asked that the <br />resolution be made clear that this Council is against any additional hardcover in the <br />future. Barrett suggested the draft be amended to state, "This Council recommends that <br />no further hardcover variance be granted on this property." <br />Kelley asked if it was the intent of this Council not to approve any future hardcover <br />variance for this property or for increases to hardcover. He noted that the property <br />owner may need a variance in order to switch or trade structure. Jabbour asKed that it be <br />worded so the intended change would not require the applicant coming back again before <br />the Council. Goetten responded that the resolution should state that there should'not be <br />any increases to hardcover. <br />Callahan said it was not his intent to vote in favor of the approval resolution and a vote <br />may be in order. Kelley noted that the applicant’s attorney was not present; and if the <br />vote were such that the resolution be denied, he suggested the application then be tabled.