My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-12-1996 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1996
>
08-12-1996 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2023 11:53:52 AM
Creation date
9/5/2023 11:51:57 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
224
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
LINDQUIST &VENNUM pllp <br />Orono City Council <br />August 8, 1996 <br />Page 3 <br />work on the project and, of course, the requirement that a building permit be obtained. <br />The ordinance does not state that the person cannot ever get a building permit because of <br />the bad behavior. Therefore, I urge you to work through the issue of alleged bad <br />behavior, punish the Albrechts as the ordinance provides with the delay and the double <br />fees, and move on to consider the substance of their request. <br />We understand that the substance of the matter is that if the Albrechts had applied <br />for a building permit, then the zoning code issue would have been raised. There <br />obviously is no problem with a building pe-miil being issued for a deck. The issue is <br />whether a deck may be addea lO this property at this location under Orono ordinances. <br />A second biack mark in some of your minds against the Albrechts' application is <br />the history of the house at 1810 Shadywood Road. Ironically, 1810 Shadywood Road was <br />the previously existing house on a 100-foot wide parcel. In 1985, the Orono City Council <br />allowed this parcel to be subdivided and a new house was constructed to the northerly of <br />the Albrechts' house. Some of you view that decision as being a mistake. I believe the <br />mistake is that the two small lots were created where there had been one large lot which <br />caused the situation to come into being that the hardcover limitation of 25% would likely <br />be exceeded. That is what turned out happened. <br />There was further City involvement with this property in 1991, when it came to <br />light that what the City viewed as a hardcover compromise by using "pavers* on the <br />EDOl 88S375 I <br />.-Vi
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.