Laserfiche WebLink
^ * <br />an additional story. <br />2.The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created <br />by the landowner. <br />The plight of the landowner is due the proposal to construct a new residence on a lot <br />that is; <br />a. Substandard pertaining to lot size, lot width, and required yards. <br />b. Impacted by the location of the lagoon on the property and hardcover for a driveway. <br />c.Existing elevations in a floodway or floodfringe district. <br />d.The location of the building site relative to the 0’-75 ’ setback requirements and <br />average lakeshore setback requirements. <br />3. The variance, if granted, w ill not alter the essential character of the locality. <br />The proposed residence would architecturally be difl'erent in style than the existing residence. <br />Buildings in this zoning district are allowed to be 2.5 stories or 30 feet. The building foundation is <br />approximately the same size as the existing residence. <br />4.Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable <br />use for the property exists under the terms of this chapter. <br />The applicant will need to provide testimony as to the findings of fact regarding the reasonable <br />use of the existing structure. <br />5. Undue hardship also includes, but is not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight <br />for solar energy systems. <br />Solar access is not an issue. <br />6.The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance <br />for any use that is not permitted under this Chapter for the property in the zone where <br />the affected person's land is located. <br />The proposed residence is a permitted use in this zoning district. <br />H2221 Sven A. IVasberg and Arlene DeCandia <br />3115 North Shore Drive. <br />Variances <br />5/19/97 <br />page~3