My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-25-1996 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1996
>
03-25-1996 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2023 4:15:25 PM
Creation date
8/31/2023 4:10:51 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
265
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON MARCH 11, 1996 <br />(U4 - #1958 Louis Oberhauser - Continued) <br />Mabusth reported that she was comfortable with moving ahead on the application. <br />Kelley said he did not believe there was compliance as the debris was not yet removed. <br />Jabbour noted that the applicant is unable to move ahead with the subdivision until final <br />plat approval has been made. <br />Oberhauser said he had no problem with tabling the conceptual approval if necessary. He <br />did, however, have a question regarding the Engineer’s request for a 20* utility easement <br />for sewer. The existing house is less than 1 5' from the side lot line, and Oberhauser <br />would request the easement for the sewer within the 1 5' He was concerned with the <br />limitations on the lot due to it being so narrow Gerhardson said the sewer line was run <br />fairly shallow, and it should probably be all right to work within the 15' Mabusth will <br />have the Engineer review this request prior to the application coming back before the <br />Council for final approval. Moorse noted that the easement is to allow work within the <br />20' and is restricted to no building within that footage. The setback is 10'. <br />Jabbour commented that the Council was willing to consider a 5' setback as the purpose <br />was to keep the building envelope out of the 75' lakeshore setback. <br />Barrett noted that conditions can be added for the preliminary subdivision review. <br />Barrett commented that the debris removal could be a condition that would be required <br />before final approval Once all conditions are met, then the application will be considered <br />for variance approvals <br />Goetten and Kelley were concerned with moving forward on the application without the <br />completion of the removal of the debris. Mabusth said she was comfortable with <br />proceeding <br />.Mabusth said she will amend the resolution to include either a 20' or a 15' easement <br />dependent on the Engineer's review. Oberhauser said he would like to speak with the <br />Engineer if a problem was shown with approving the 15' easement. <br />Goetten moved. Kelley seconded, to approve Resolution #3689 with Engineer's review of <br />easement requirement. Vote; Ayes 3, Nays 0. <br />(*#5) #2099 LOREN BRUEGGEMANN/DEAN MAESER, 372 WESTLAKE <br />STREET - DENIAL RESOLUTION #3690 <br />Goetten moved. Kelley seconded, to adopt Resolution #3690 denying variances to <br />Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) and Section 11.30, Subdivision <br />5 (C) and denying a request tor subdivtsion ot the property located at 372 Westlake <br />Street. Vote; Ayes 3, Nays 0.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.