My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-26-1996 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1996
>
02-26-1996 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2023 4:00:10 PM
Creation date
8/31/2023 3:58:34 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
169
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Requ^ for Council Action Continued <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />Februar}' 8, 1996 <br />Change Orders Number 1 and 2 For The Brown Road North and Watertowr Road <br />Culvert Projects (SAP 152-107-01 and SAP 152-103-01)_____________________ <br />Clarification Concerning Easement Costs <br />A meeting was recently held with Boncstroo statf to obtain clarifications and explanations <br />of the cost overrun items, and to underscore the importance of proper change order tollow- <br />through. The meeting was very productive in providing important claritications. and in <br />identifying measures to prevent cost overruns and ensure proper follow-through on change <br />orders in the future. <br />One of the results of the discussion was a clarification regarding the cost overrun items <br />related to easement negotiations. The cost of easement acquisition is generally not estimated <br />or tracked as part of the project construction costs. In this case, however, the negotiation <br />of easements involved construction-related costs because the project required work beyond <br />the existing right-of-way on heavily treed property. Three of the cost-overrun items relate <br />to easement acquisition, although they are being reflected as construction costs. These are <br />the retaining wall, and tree replacements on both North Brown Road and Watertown Road. <br />Each of these "construction " costs was added to minimize the costs of easement acquisition. <br />The only way to successfully and reasonably negotiate the easement acquisition was to agree <br />to replace the trees that needed to be removed. <br />Although the inclusion of construction-related items such as tree replacement as pan of the <br />easement acquisition negotiation enabled the negotiations to move ahead to completion (vs. <br />requiring condemnation), they did result in construction cost overruns. The total easement <br />costs including the cons'metion work was $54,461. Although this is not a small amount, <br />it does reflect the level of costs required to acquire easements on heavily treed property. <br />preventative Measures <br />The discussion also involved a review of the construction projec t process, from the <br />feasibility report through the project completion; to identify ways to ensure accur. i cost <br />estimates, prevent cost overruns and ensure any additional cost items are forwarded to the <br />Council for authorization prior to incurring the additional costs. The measures identified <br />are as follows; <br />1.Prior to finalizing plans and specifications, identify all required easements and <br />any construction-related items that will be required as pan of easement <br />acquisition. These construction items can then be included in the plans and <br />specifications and in the project costs.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.