11-10-1997 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

The projwsed lot sizes are consistent with the majority of the lots in the area. This is a umque situation due to the decrease in lot size attributable to lakeshore erosion. Both lots ^e also considered to be comer lots. This further limits the allowable building pad Lot 1. ® ^on 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The subject properties are separate tax parcels and have been assessed separately for sewer and water. Lot 1 has never been built up>on, however. 11.The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. The variance will not impair health, safety, comfort or morals. 12.The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but IS necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. ^e lots were platted and approved prior to current zoning requirements. The request for bt area and bedcover variances have previously been approved by resolution. It should • i"oo^ f Planning Commission had unanimously denied the previous application in 1987 for the reasons cited on the attached notice of Planning Commission action (Attachment 1). Issues 1.Lots 1 and 2 combined consist of approximately one acre total. If the lots were combined, the lot area, width and hardcover requirements would be met. 2.11 ^ variances and Lot 2 was granted a hardcover variance to I 1987. The resolution is attached (Attachment H). The issue of lot width for both lots was not discussed. No other variances have been granted. 3.If Ae variMces^e renewed, lot width variances would also be required as both lots do not meet the 140 requirement. 4.The non-conforming side setback of 9.3 ’ for Lot 2 is not an issue with this appiication. ^2283 Gary and Bonnie Birnbautn 2695 Kelly Avenue Variances 9/15/97 Page 5 ^ * ifv