Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />1 I. <br />Hardcover : <br />Distance <br />from <br />Shoreline <br />Total Area in <br />Setback <br />Existing <br />Hardcover <br />Allowed <br />Hardcover <br />Proposed <br />Hardcover <br />Variance <br />Requested <br />0'-75"Lot 1: 8,722 none none none none <br />s.f.(1987 <br />figure) <br />Lot 2: 6,025 <br />s.f. <br />none none none none <br />75'-250"Lot 1:8,035 <br />s.f. <br />6 s.f. (.007%)2008.8 s.f <br />(25%) <br />6 s.f (.007%) none <br />Lot 2: 20,935 6,394 s.f.5,233.75 s.f 5,848 s.f 614 25 s.f <br />s.f.(28.6%)(25%)(28.6%)(3.6%) <br />Lot 2 (Bimbaum residence) does not meet hardcover requirements in the 75' to 250' lakeshore <br />setback. The previous resolution allowed for 30% hardcover to remain. Lot 1 is undeveloped. <br />STATEMENT OF HARDSHIP <br />Attachment J is a letter from the applicant expressing hardship. Applicants should also be asked <br />for their testimony regarding this issue. <br />Criteria for Determining Undue Hardship <br />1.The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions <br />aiiowed by the official controls. <br />Lot 1 has been used as part of Lot 2 to date because both are held by the same owners. <br />Lot 1 is not buildable without lot area and width variances. <br />2.The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created <br />by the landowner. <br />The lots of record were approved prior to current city zoning ordinances. The <br />configuration of Lot 1 along a protected body of water limits hardcover and building <br />area to a greater extent than if the parcel was entirely contiguous. The updated survey <br />reveals that the lot area, as well as contiguous area of Lot 1 is less than the lot size <br />approved previously. Rock was added along the fence by the city several months ago. <br />i^22S3 Gary and Bonnie Bimbaum <br />2693 Kelly Avenue <br />Variances <br />9/13/97 <br />Page I