Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 18, 1997 <br />(#2 - #2279/#2280 Marc and Tracy Whitehead - Continued) <br />There are two septic sites determined for Lots 1,2, and 3 but only one for Lot 4. From <br />the City perspective, Lot 4 would then not be buildable. The applicant has asked for <br />consideration of platting the lot for future development when sewer is available. Staff <br />does not recommend this option. Gafi&on noted that the revised layout for septic sites <br />does not match the testing performed in 1990. Lot 1 site is accurate but Lot 2 does not <br />match. Lot 3's alternate site and Lot 4 site differ. There is also an administrative review <br />needed to approve the septic system setback from the ponds in Lots 2 and 3. There is <br />normally a 75' setback. The inspector preliminarily noted he is not concerned, however, as <br />the ^es are higher than the wetlands. The Type 1 wetland in Lot I is small and would <br />allow for septic sites up to the edge of the wetland but not into the wetland. <br />Gaffron reviewed the issues regarding specific tots. Width variances are required for Lots <br />1,2, and 3. Drainfield setback from the pond is an issue for Lots 2 and 3. The problem <br />with the drain field setback for the principal sepfic site in Lot 1 is most likely solved <br />according to Gaffron. However, there is no alternate site for Lot 4. The 26' wetland <br />separation requirement will require a variance for building of the NURP pond. Gaffron <br />indicated that he has received the wetland delineation report. There is concern regarding <br />the septic site locations for Lots 2 and 4. Gaffron asked the Planning Commission to <br />the applicant direction regarding whether Lot 4 is buildable. Gaffron said the review in bis <br />opinion is an extenson of the sketch plan reNnew at this point, since Lot 4 clearly does not <br />meet minimum septic requirements. <br />Smith asked for clarification on where the Luce Lme horse trail is located and what the <br />DNR setback is from the trail. Gaffron indicated there is a 100' right-of-way and showed <br />the location of the center line. He said the trail is 50-60' from the north lot line. It was <br />noted that there is no special City setback requirement from the trail and none imposed by <br />DNR. <br />Hawn was informed that the DNR has not responded to the application. <br />McMillan was told that the DNR has been notified of the request for vacation. <br />Whitehead apolo^ed for the incorrect information on the septic site locations. She <br />indicated that the setback requirements will be met. Whitehead said she understood the <br />Commission would like to see a cul-de-sac for emergency truck sta^g if necessary. She <br />said there was not alot of discussion regarding the plan itself Whitehead indicated she <br />knew the wetland delineation was necessary. Whitehead felt she has met the concerns of <br />the Commission regarding the cul-de-sac and will widen the curve on Lyman Avenue. <br />There are two large oak trees impeding this from occurring but Whitehead said they could <br />be removed.