My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-22-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1997
>
09-22-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2023 9:54:55 AM
Creation date
8/1/2023 9:50:53 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
426
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 18, 1997 <br />(#2 - #2279/#2280 Marc and Tracy Whitehead - Continued) <br />Whitehead indicated that they attempted to present a plan with few variances required but <br />the topography has created some problem. It is their desire to preserve the nature of the <br />neighborhood. Whhehead said the neighbors will notice the road going in but will not be <br />able to view the houses as they will be located back on the lots. Whitehead said the <br />setback requirements will be met except for the drainfield on Lot 2. The 200' width <br />requirement is difficult to meet with the creation of the cul-de-sac. The alternate septic <br />she location for Lot 4 would be located undemeatl v '.where the cul-de-sac is to be located. <br />She asked the Commission to give consideration for lipproving Lot 4 for building in the <br />future when the sewer is connected. Whitehead aske<' the Commission to assist in <br />expediting the application so she can sell her current home and move. <br />Margret and Brano Stankov^ indicated they live in the substandard sized lot that b next <br />to the proposed subdivbion. Stankovsl^ said he has spoken with the applicant. He <br />indicated it would not be appealing to have a 50' wide roadway at a location 31* from Us <br />home. Stankovsky said tUs would add to the substandard Condition of hb property and <br />decrease his value. Stankovsky indicated that while the new lots would meet the required <br />setbacks, Us own property would not be protected by a 50' setback. He noted there is no <br />mention in the plan for screening of the road to reduce noise from traffic. He also was <br />unaware of the pitch of the roadway as noted and is concerned with runoff. He fek the <br />change would aid runoff but is concerned with snow being plowed closer to Us property. <br />Stankovslgr said he is concerned for Us septic system. <br />Stankovsky requested the Planning Commission consider requiring that the road be placed <br />at least 50' from Us property, that buffering next to the road occur, and that an effective <br />drainage plan be required. Stankovsky would like to sec minimum variances approved. <br />He noted he has requested to purchase additional land from the WUtehead's in order to <br />meet the 2 acre zoning requirement. <br />Brian Palmer, 1190 Lyman, lives east of the subject pro,perty. He is concerned with <br />Outlot B chan^ng the character of the neighborhood. He feels the application should be <br />allowed only minimal variances. Palmer does not understood how Lot 4 could be <br />conforming and believes the subdivision should consist of three lots only. <br />Hope Pesek, 1235 Lyman, ’’ *3 south of the subject property. Pesek feels the large <br />turnaround and driveway is i appropriate for the area. Pesek suggested the use of the <br />abandoned area for the cul-de-sac. She asked what the purpose is for an 80' road. <br />Gofifiron explained the cul-de-sac would allow for fire truck staging and easier snow plow <br />maintenance. <br /># ^
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.