Laserfiche WebLink
#2240 <br />June 18,1997 <br />Page 2 <br />3 & 4 were reviewed at the June meeting, and both require rezoning, <br />MUSA/Comp Plan amendments and provision of municipal sewer. <br />Planning Commission’s general comments included the following: <br />If developed, the property needs to be sewered; i.e. there is general support for a <br />MUSA amendment <br />PRD is Justified in order to preserve open space by clustering <br />A majority would like to see something in the range of no more than 15-20 units; the <br />28 umt plan was generally not embraced due to the density; a mixed reaction to <br />re^rung, but members generally felt there is no logic to the zoning/MUSA boundaiy <br />as It currently exists in this area; rezoning will make for a more logical subdivision <br />Some support for trails through site or at least connecting to park <br />Much support for preserving/dedicating open space adjacent to park land <br />Support for some restrictions on what can be done to trees and ponds <br />Concept Sketch 3 was agreed by the majority to be the best of the 4 proposals <br />Comparison of Concept Sketches 1-4 <br /># of Lots <br />Average Lot Size <br />(Approx.) <br />Typical Lot Width <br />Dedicated Open Space <br />Approvals needed: <br />R=Rezoning <br />S“Sewer <br />Mc=MUSA/Comp Plan <br />P=PRD/CUP <br />Sketch 1 <br />17 <br />1.4 ac. <br />R, S, Me <br />Sketch 2 <br />16 <br />1.6 ac. <br />Sketch 3 <br />0.97 ac. <br />S,Mc R, S, Me, P <br />Sketch 4 <br />0.35 ac <br />5 ac. (plus 8-10 <br />ac. of'Common') <br />R, S, Me, P