Laserfiche WebLink
#2209April 18,1997 (Revised 4-21.97)Page 11 3. Preservntionof Open Spnee Character Maintnimny Natural Rural Vistas, and Trve <br />Removal and Replacement . Applicant has provided a depiction of existing areas where <br />trees will be removed (Plan Sheets 6.7 A 8). as well as a conceptual plan showing the <br />in a general way the areas of the site which are proposed to be vegetated (colored map). <br />Additionally provided is a letter from Ostvig Tree noting that 600-800 existing trees on the <br />sif<* can be relocated, which must be done during May-June to enhance survivability. <br />Applicant proposes transplanting many trees into areas that ore now open, spccincally in the <br />east half of the site. To date, no detailed plan specifically defining the areas proposed for tree <br />planting has been submitted. <br />• <br />Use of the property as a golf course inherently will tend to preserve open space and rural <br />V istas to a great extent, as compared to a residential housing development of the type <br />common to Orono. However, preservation of views not only encompasses preservation of <br />open spaces but should include keeping those views 'available*. One way to accomplish this <br />is by limiting the occurrence of screening fences or berms which, while provft>q: a barrier <br />for the benefit of the property owner, can result in passenby experiencing '.v>nel vision* <br />similar to an urban freeway. This being said, applicants propose no such barriers; but <br />approval should be conditioned on limits' eing placed on the future use of such barriers. <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION; <br />1. Approval should be conditioned on City acceptance of a final detailed tree <br />replacement plan. <br />2. Grading plan must avoid the use of berms which block visla-typc views of the site <br />from the idjncenl roadways. <br />3. i'erimeter fencing of the site, if proposed, shall be of a low opaqueness, such as a <br />Sf..it-rail or similar fencing. <br />C. Site Activity Impacts <br />1. Maintenance Activity Impacts . The poTc ri.il impacts on the immediate <br />neighborhood of the maintenance building may include noise, vibration, odors, lights <br />and activity involving vehicles and equipment at early and lute hours not generally <br />associated with a residential neighborhood. There are only one or two nearby residences in <br />'close* proximity to the maintenance facility, the nearest being approximately 200 feel to the <br />west. <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval should be subject to applicant complying <br />with the City's ordinances with regard to noise, vibration, odors, lighting, etc. <br />#220QApril 18.1997 (Revised 4-21-97) Page 12 2. Clubhouse Area Activity. The proposed golf course use is not inherently <br />incompatible with the surrounding single family residential neighborhood. Based on <br />Orono's Comprehensive Plan, the Cit)**- ^iral residential zoning districts are appropriate <br />locations for golf courses and similar recreational uses. The activities proposed to be <br />associated with the Clubhouse at the level of use proposed (golf shop, instruction, club/cart <br />rental, lunch kitchen and dining room, and overnight guest rooms) will generally not make <br />the golf course a 'bad i.. ighbor*. <br />However, at a level of use that might bring crowds of onlookers (for instance, a large <br />tou.namcnt or special event), the golf course could bring a significant degree of activity to <br />th; area. Likewise, conversion of the golf course to a higher level of use than that proposed <br />(' Jdition of members, conversion to public course, etc.) could result in unanticipated activity <br />levels which should be subject to further City review and approval prior to their being <br />allowed. <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval should be conditioned on the requirement <br />of a new CUP for future changes in the level of activity at the site (the initial <br />proposed level of use must first be defined in terms of number of members, types of <br />activity allowed, etc.) or for conversion to a public course. <br />3. Impact of Seasonal Use. The seasonal nature of the golf course use Is not <br />expected to have a negative impact on the neighborhood. <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Applicants should define what level of activity will <br />occur in the winter (lunches? pro shop open? x-c skiing?) and if none, define any <br />security measures intended. <br />D. Golf Course Amenities <br />The clubhouse will contain 4 guest rooms as well as kitchen/dinlng facilities in addition to <br />the locker rooms and other typical operational facilities and ofTtces. Parking facilities for 60 <br />COTS would be required by code, and approximately 125 stalls will be provided per the most <br />recent parking plan revision. A rest station with toilets and a concession stands is proposed <br />to be located north of the Co. Rd. 6 tunnel. Is this location potentially a problem due to its <br />proximity to 6, for use os a wayside by motorists, or to stop and grab a soft drink? How will <br />it be screened? <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission should identify any issues they have <br />with the above noted amenities.