Laserfiche WebLink
d. If a, b, or c were marked Yes, di;iC;.‘S3 any cumulative environmental impacts resulting <br />from this project and the other develc-onisn*. <br />The cumulative environmental effects of th e g\.‘h'course project combined with other nearby <br />developments, will be typical of urbanizatiitv, increased land use, higher traffic volumes, <br />increased water use, etc. <br />31. Other Potential Environmental Impacts if the project may cause any adverse <br />environmental impacts which were not addressed by items 1 to 28, identify and discuss <br />them here, along with any proposed mitigation. <br />None <br />32. Summary of Issues (This section need not be completed if the EAW is being done for <br />EIS scoping; instead, address relevant issues in the draft Scoping Decision document <br />which must accompany the EAW.) List any impacts and issues identified above that may <br />require further investigation before the project is commenced. Discuss any alternatives or <br />mitigative measures that have been or may be considered for these impacts and issues, <br />including those that have been or may be ordered as permit conditions. <br />Wetland impacts will be mitigated in accordance with the 1996 Minnesota Wetland <br />Conservation Act and the Federal Clean Water Act. The project has been planned to <br />minimize future environmental impact. Many alternatives have been analyzed to minimize <br />impacts to wetlands, water quality of Long Lake, stormwater runoff, traffic, etc.. Feasible <br />alternatives have been incorporated into the current design. A 43 acre Big Woods remnant <br />will be reduced by approximately 49.7%. Alternative measures to mitigate the project's <br />impact on the Big Woods remnant will be analyzed and considered. However, the cities <br />of Orono and Medina do not have regulations in place or authority to require preservation <br />of the Big Woods remnant. <br />Further analysis will be conducted regarding the need for repair or structural rehabilitation <br />of local roads, and regarding the need for safety improvements at intersections on County <br />Road 6. <br />CERTIFICATIONS BY THE RGU (all 3 certifications must be signed for EQB acceptance of the <br />EAW for publication of notice in the EQB Monitor) <br />A. I hereby certify that the information contained in this document is accurate and complete <br />to the best of my knowledge. Signature ___________ <br />B. I hereby certify that the project described in this EAW is the complete project and there are <br />no other projects, project stages, or project component?, other than those described in this <br />document, which are related to the project as "connected actions" or "phased actions." as <br />defined, respectively, at Minn. Rules, pts. 4410.0200, Subp. 9b and Subp 60. <br />Signature _____________ <br />C. I hereby certify that copies of the completed EAW are being sent to all points on the official <br />EQB EAW distribution list. Signature _____________ <br />Title of signer_________________ Date_______________