My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-19-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
10-19-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:31:38 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:23:09 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
436
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6. <br />7. <br />There are engineering concerns with the proposed plan. The consulting <br />engineer has indicated that the slopes were drawn at a 2:1 ratio which makes <br />it very difficult to maintain. A 3:1 ratio is recommended. He is also concerned <br />about grading next to existing structures on adjacent property. He is also <br />concerned about drainage and the retaining walls being 6* or higher. He also <br />questioned how the driveway would be designed to channel runoff away from the <br />garage and off of the sides of the driveway. His letter is EXHIBIT a. <br />This application also requires a conditional use permit for land alteration and <br />grading. The proper legal notification and publication did not occur because <br />the preliminary plan w'as not received in time. The proposed plan prepared by <br />Larson Associates requires 831 cubic yards (83 truckloads) with an 8% slope for <br />the driveway. The other plan has a greater slope and requires less fill. <br />8. <br />9. <br />City staff has not received any comments from the adjacent property owner and <br />staff is not certain that the neighbor has reviewed the revised plan. <br />The 60-day review period was extended an additional 60 days which expires November <br />8th for the original variance application. Because the revised plan was received on <br />October 9th and now requires a conditional use permit, the review period should <br />start over from October 9th. <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br />To review the two proposed plans which both require side yard adjacent to street setbacks, hardcover <br />variances, and a conditional use permit. The conditional use permit public hearing should be <br />set for either November 16th with the applicant providing additional mailing labels or be scheduled <br />for November 9 at the City Council meeting. <br />Attachments <br />a <br />b <br />c <br />d <br />e <br />f <br />g <br />h <br />I <br />• <br />J <br />A <br />B <br />Consultant Engineer's letter <br />Larson Assoc, memo <br />Larson's calculations <br />Hardcover calculations <br />Building pad analysis <br />Original plan <br />Larson plan —831 c.y. of fill <br />Alternate plan —less fill <br />Minutes from 7/20/98 <br />Minutes from 8/17/98 <br />Application <br />Plat Map <br />B2 Elevations <br />C Topo <br />D Sewer map <br />I, J, K Plans <br />M Permit Record <br />H2i95 Brtnt Bentroit <br />page-5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.