10-19-1998 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Hardcover Distance from Shoreline Total Area in Setback Existing Hardcover Allowed Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Variance Requested 0'-75 ’3,704 sq. ft.365 sq. ft. (9.85%) NONE 4 sq. ft..01 75-250 ’9,960 sq. ft.2,334 sq. ft. (23.43%) 2,490 sq.ft. (25%) 3,518 sq. ft. (35.32%) 1,028 sq. ft. (10.32%) 250'-500‘3,478 sq. ft.780 sq. ft. (22.43%) 1,043.4 sq. ft. (30%) 928 sq. ft, (26.68%) None. TOTALS: 17,142 sq. ft. % of LOT AREA: 3,479 sq.ft. 20.2% 4,450 sq. ft. 25.9% The proposed plan represents an overall increase in hardcover of 971 sq. ft. Hardcover is proposed to be reduced in both the 0’-75' and 250’ -500’ setbacks. The consulting engineer questioned whether the area between the parallel sidewalks would be hardcover. According to the Building Inspector, applicants have proposed similar parallel paved areas in the past to reduce hardcover, however, the City has considered the entire area between the .sidewalks to be regarded as hardcover because it becomes compacted as it is driven over. The Planning Commission should determine whether this area should be added into the hardcover calculations. ISSUES 1. The subject lot does not meet lot area or lot width requirements. 2. 3. 4. 5. The west side of the property is subject to a 35' setback from platted, unopened Bluff Street. The applicant originally requested vacation of a 10’ portion of Bluff Street which was not favorably received by the Planning Commission. The existing deck encroaches into the required side yard adjacent to street. Both the proposed porch/deck and new garage encroach into the required setback. The existing garage encroaches into the required street yard setback. The existing hardcover exceeds the limits in the 0’-75 ’ setback. The applicant is proposing to remove hardcover in the 0’-75 ’ setback, however, overall hardcover would increase on the zoning lot. iJJPJ BrfU Btniroil pagf-4