My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-20-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
04-20-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:14:18 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:06:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
356
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #2355 <br />April 13, 1998 <br />Page 4 <br />3. <br />then becoming substandard, does it make any sense to require such crediting? <br />Should a lot area variance be granted due to to extenuating circumstances which may <br />constitute a hardship, such as: <br />No additional land av’ailable, but septic needs met and Lot is 22 acres total <br />- Existing house allowed to be built under current zoning standards <br />- Location of existing roads <br />- 'Ripple effect’ of crediting property from across the road <br />It would be highly unusual for the City to allow the creation of a substandard lot in a new <br />subdivision (staff is aware of only two such occurrences since 1975, one related to City easement <br />acquisition and the other the result of a rezoning). The circumstances surrounding this property are <br />very unique in that few other tax parcels of this size in the City are split by public rights of way. <br />More common is the lakeshore lot with a County road between the house and the lake, where acreage <br />on both sides of the road is credited... <br />Access <br />Hennepin County has agreed to build a new access driveway for Lot 1, Block 2 onto McCulley Road <br />at a location approximately 450-600' from the new intersection. This location will require City <br />approval. The County will also build a new driveway onto Tumham Road for the southeasterly 8 <br />acres. The existing driveway for Lot 1, Block 1 appears acceptable. <br />Subdivision Classification - Relation to Park Dedication <br />Per the curent subdivision code adopted in 1984, a proposal to create 3 or more lots from a single <br />tax parcel is considered by definition as a Class III subdivision, requiring a formal plat, dedication <br />of wetland easements, etc. Also, as a Class III subdivision the plat is subject to Park Dedication <br />requirements (Zoning Code Section 11.62). This subdivision will be presented to the Park <br />Commission for review at their May 4 meeting for a recommendation as to whether land dedication <br />or park fee should be required. Note that the Orono trail plan does indicate a future trail along <br />McCulley Road. <br />Storm Water, Grading and Drainage <br />The City Engineer has commented on this subdivision regarding stormwater, grading and drainage <br />(see Exhibit M). The relatively large acreages in each lot result in only a minimal potential for <br />impacts to nearby surface waters. With the likelyhood that only 2 new homes will be constructed <br />on lots of 5acres and 6 acres respectively, and no new roads being created to ser\'e the subdivision, <br />it is staffs expectation that MCWD would not require a permit nor any ponding, and no fee <br />contribution. The City's goal for this development, as noted by the City Engineer, is that pre-
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.